• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The doom and gloom vs reality"

Collapse

  • motoukenin
    replied
    Originally posted by Cirrus View Post
    Everyone is blaming the Government for not coming up with a Brexit strategy. They've made no progress in two years so how useless must they be.

    However, when will it dawn on everyone that there simply isn't a Brexit strategy? I guess Theresa already can see that. She's ostensibly nurturing a stay-in-only-worse-off approach but she'll never get away with that. The hard exit (which is what people voted for) is too expensive and disruptive. So all she can do is the classic deathmarch manoeuvre that so many of us project people have seen played out so many times - just keep plodding along and shoving in the invoices until the merde finally hits the fan.

    Then blame everybody else.
    Unfortunately most of the retards who voted for it wont be in a position to move on after 'project fail' concludes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    That's democracy for you. Bad politicians are voted in and their parties get into power because of the people who vote for them.
    The Leave group based everything that is wrong with the UK on the EU. They failed to accept any responsibility lay with the UK and how the UK Government, UK Home Office, etc, brought in laws and implemented them.
    Then an election was called, and the same UK government got voted in again.

    These bad politicians were voted in.

    Then there's the House of Lords, which according to many Leave supporters, should be disbanded.
    ...and hanged is the implication.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Whether it's for better or for worse depends on the politicians,
    That's democracy for you. Bad politicians are voted in and their parties get into power because of the people who vote for them.
    The Leave group based everything that is wrong with the UK on the EU. They failed to accept any responsibility lay with the UK and how the UK Government, UK Home Office, etc, brought in laws and implemented them.
    Then an election was called, and the same UK government got voted in again.

    These bad politicians were voted in.

    Then there's the House of Lords, which according to many Leave supporters, should be disbanded.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    No, because that was not on the ballot form. What we voted for was to leave. That means leaving everything, for better or for worse. Whether it's for better or for worse depends on the politicians, which doesn't fill me with an enormous dose of hope...
    For better or for worse depends on the politicians? That’s a massive cop-out.

    The Leave campaign was all about sunny uplands and how everything would be easy. Any attempt to cost the exit was dismissed as “Project Fear”. There are no forecasted scenarios where anything will be “better”, only gradients of worse.

    Let’s say that the Leave campaign was more honest about a hard Brexit:
    - leaving the CU + SM, meaning a hard border in Ireland, tailbacks in Kent, JIT industries closing down and leaving the U.K.
    - leaving all EU agencies, and the cost of replacing them with our own. Euratom, Galileo, Erasmus, EASA, EMA, etc
    - new trade deals that will have an element of FoM about them. India, Australia, etc.
    - no cash for the NHS. The cost of setting up the new agencies means that the NHS will need to cut back even further.
    - etc

    I suspect that the vote may have been different if all the facts and costs were laid out more honestly at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    More great news from the thinking patriot's favourite news source.

    British Government's preparation for a 'no deal' Brexit has ground to a halt | Daily Mail Online

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    No, because that was not on the ballot form. What we voted for was to leave. That means leaving everything, for better or for worse. Whether it's for better or for worse depends on the politicians, which doesn't fill me with an enormous dose of hope...
    No. Leaving everything was not on the ballot paper. Leaving the EU was on the ballot paper. The EEA, customs union and single market are up for debate.

    In many ways the EEA would represent the mid point of the electorate and would also be in line with the UK's history of opt outs and negativity about ever closer union.

    To respect the electorate's negativity about immigration, a model based more firmly around free movement of labour rather than free movement of people could be implemented. IIRC Norway has such a model but I may have remembered that incorrectly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    People didn’t vote for a hard exit.
    No, because that was not on the ballot form. What we voted for was to leave. That means leaving everything, for better or for worse. Whether it's for better or for worse depends on the politicians, which doesn't fill me with an enormous dose of hope...

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    The doom and gloom vs reality

    Originally posted by Cirrus View Post
    Everyone is blaming the Government for not coming up with a Brexit strategy. They've made no progress in two years so how useless must they be.

    However, when will it dawn on everyone that there simply isn't a Brexit strategy? I guess Theresa already can see that. She's ostensibly nurturing a stay-in-only-worse-off approach but she'll never get away with that. The hard exit (which is what people voted for) is too expensive and disruptive. So all she can do is the classic deathmarch manoeuvre that so many of us project people have seen played out so many times - just keep plodding along and shoving in the invoices until the merde finally hits the fan.

    Then blame everybody else.
    People didn’t vote for a hard exit. Yougov polls since Brexit show a majority of Remainers supporting the SM, and Brexiters split.



    But you’re right about there not being a plan.

    Last edited by meridian; 27 May 2018, 23:01.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by Cirrus View Post
    Everyone is blaming the Government for not coming up with a Brexit strategy. They've made no progress in two years so how useless must they be.

    However, when will it dawn on everyone that there simply isn't a Brexit strategy? I guess Theresa already can see that. She's ostensibly nurturing a stay-in-only-worse-off approach but she'll never get away with that. The hard exit (which is what people voted for) is too expensive and disruptive. So all she can do is the classic deathmarch manoeuvre that so many of us project people have seen played out so many times - just keep plodding along and shoving in the invoices until the merde finally hits the fan.

    Then blame everybody else.
    What this is all about is taking the good bits of the 1960's and combining with the good bits of the 2000's unfortunately what is now happening is that it is combining the bad bits of the 1960's with the bad bits of the 2000's.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    He's speaking to an audience of EU fanatics; if he said anything vaguely diplomatic about Brexit he'd probably be lynched "pour encourager les autres".

    PS - you need to stop reading the Excess, it'll do nothing good to your blood pressure...
    I don't belong to the target group for which these headlines were designed to raise blood pressure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cirrus
    replied
    Rearranging the Deck Chairs on RMS Brextanic

    Everyone is blaming the Government for not coming up with a Brexit strategy. They've made no progress in two years so how useless must they be.

    However, when will it dawn on everyone that there simply isn't a Brexit strategy? I guess Theresa already can see that. She's ostensibly nurturing a stay-in-only-worse-off approach but she'll never get away with that. The hard exit (which is what people voted for) is too expensive and disruptive. So all she can do is the classic deathmarch manoeuvre that so many of us project people have seen played out so many times - just keep plodding along and shoving in the invoices until the merde finally hits the fan.

    Then blame everybody else.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    He's speaking to an audience of EU fanatics; if he said anything vaguely diplomatic about Brexit he'd probably be lynched "pour encourager les autres".

    PS - you need to stop reading the Excess, it'll do nothing good to your blood pressure...
    Actually it just looks like the Europhobic Express blowing things up out proportion, again.

    Agree with your second comment, maybe it's the choice of paper for gammons

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    in remarks prepared for delivery to a gathering in Portugal of jurists specialised in EU law.
    He's speaking to an audience of EU fanatics; if he said anything vaguely diplomatic about Brexit he'd probably be lynched "pour encourager les autres".

    PS - you need to stop reading the Excess, it'll do nothing good to your blood pressure...

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    EU WON’T PAY: You’re not getting your £1BILLION Galileo satellite cash back

    Lets have a whip round.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    BOW TO BRUSSELS! Barnier gets nasty and warns UK to accept EU SUPREMACY before Brexit

    My money is on the UK kowtowing to Brussels.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X