• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Not really going well is it?"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    The trouble with that article is that, apart from the link to the speech not owrking, is that the speech actually doesn't really mention anything about Britain not joining, that was in an earlier essay (for which no link is provided) so by the time he gave this speech, he may have changed his mind. In fact the speech is all 'we' which implies Great Britain as well...
    There you go!


    The Churchill Society London. Churchill's Speeches.

    am now going to say something that will astonish you.

    The first step in the re-creation of the European family must be a partnership between France and Germany.
    oops he must have forgotten the UK??? Surely we should be ruled by the new Europe. Surely NAZI Germany & Vichy France can't be left alone with sharp implements?


    Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America, and I trust Soviet Russia - for then indeed all would be well - must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe and must champion its right to live and shine.
    Oh sorry he didn't he was very specific France + Germany without the UK not an EU superstate. I doubt he would change his mind, he was pretty resolute.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I actually couldn't think of anything passive aggressive to say then, even as a joke.

    I knew I could count on your vote though!
    For cretin of the year? I've already pledged my support to oPM.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    We are the prom king and queen of CUK passive aggression.
    I actually couldn't think of anything passive aggressive to say then, even as a joke.

    I knew I could count on your vote though!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Interesting, and what are your views on voting for me as personality of the year for CUK? I'm not as tuliptly passive agressive as you, so vote for me.
    We are the prom king and queen of CUK passive aggression.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Let it all out. It is all part of your grieving process.
    Interesting, and what are your views on voting for me as personality of the year for CUK? I'm not as tuliptly passive agressive as you, so vote for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Do you know what, if we had stayed in the toxic club, "our" president would have been one Tony f**king Blair, and he would have sold us down the river quicker than anyone could say "how do you spell offshore account"?
    Let it all out. It is all part of your grieving process.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Do you know what, if we had stayed in the toxic club, "our" president would have been one Tony f**king Blair, and he would have sold us down the river quicker than anyone could say "how do you spell offshore account"?
    I know Blair wanted it but I suspect he wouldn't have got it, he's too toxic for many people. Anyway, he held the Presidency of the Council of the European Union from January to June 1998 and July to December 2005.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    The trouble with that article is that, apart from the link to the speech not owrking, is that the speech actually doesn't really mention anything about Britain not joining, that was in an earlier essay (for which no link is provided) so by the time he gave this speech, he may have changed his mind. In fact the speech is all 'we' which implies Great Britain as well...
    We must build a kind of United States of Europe.
    ...
    If we are to form the United States of Europe or whatever name or form it may take, we must begin now.
    ...
    Our constant aim must be to build and fortify the strength of the United Nations Organisation.

    Under and within that world concept, we must re-create the European family in a regional structure called, it may be, the United States of Europe.

    The first step is to form a Council of Europe.

    If at first all the States of Europe are not willing or able to join the Union, we must nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Martin Schulz is an abhorrent twat. However, if the UK had been more assertive and stayed in the EU, they would have the EU Presidency and could have made a statement to the contrary. As it stands for the UK it's run rabbit run rabbit run run run
    Do you know what, if we had stayed in the toxic club, "our" president would have been one Tony f**king Blair, and he would have sold us down the river quicker than anyone could say "how do you spell offshore account"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Interesting article, thanks.

    Of course the difference between his vision in the 40's and now, is he assumed that the commonwealth countries would still be reliant and heavily joined with the UK, but as the article says many of these have moved away from the UK and formed their own deals in their local regions and hence the world of Churchill is not the world of today. In Churchill's day we still had HK, Singers, India had only just gained independence, we still had close ties to Oz, NZ, Canada, we still had Cyprus, Botswana and a whole host of other countries. Our power in the world has diminished over the years and we have naturally grown closer to the continent but many in the UK still long for those colonial days that are long gone.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Really?
    https://www.ft.com/content/3d6bbabc-...9-1365ce54b926

    Yep

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    But Churchill didn’t view the UK as a member, rather as the head of our own powerful commonwealth.
    Really?

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    He was only paraphrasing that great British leader...



    But Churchill didn’t view the UK as a member, rather as the head of our own powerful commonwealth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Oh, I'm still jubilant, my cup indeed runneth over, but I'm not taking any crap from the Germans over Brexit. Their little plan failed:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...pe-germany-sdp

    I wonder what the voting results might have been in June 2016 if this little scrote had put his oar in...
    Martin Schulz is an abhorrent twat. However, if the UK had been more assertive and stayed in the EU, they would have the EU Presidency and could have made a statement to the contrary. As it stands for the UK it's run rabbit run rabbit run run run

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Oh, I'm still jubilant, my cup indeed runneth over, but I'm not taking any crap from the Germans over Brexit. Their little plan failed:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...pe-germany-sdp

    I wonder what the voting results might have been in June 2016 if this little scrote had put his oar in...
    He was only paraphrasing that great British leader...



    Leave a comment:

Working...
X