- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: More retrospection?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "More retrospection?"
Collapse
-
Just one point, there is no "EBT ruling" by any court in a "JP morgan case".
JP Morgan have decided to take up the settlement offer, for reasons best known to themselves. They decided to settle, before going to court.
UBS did actually challenge HMRC and went to court....and won. EDIT: actually, not sure if the case they won incldued an EBT element or not, some reprots mention it, some dont.Last edited by sal626; 12 November 2012, 11:56.
Leave a comment:
-
-
As a moderator shouldn't you be above this sort of comment? I've suffered bans from one of your colleagues for far less.Originally posted by cojak View PostI'm sure that Vallah will come along shortly to point out that JP Morgan didn't set their EBT up properly and had they spoken to him this would never have happened.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm sure that Vallah will come along shortly to point out that JP Morgan didn't set their EBT up properly and had they spoken to him this would never have happened.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm sure Rangers FC thought they had put some considerable effort into the setup of their EBT but putting dates of payments and amounts into players contracts made it's EBT invalid. I suspect JP Morgan had something similiar in their Employees contracts.Originally posted by captainham View PostYou'd have to expect that a company such as JPMorgan put some considerable effort into getting the "right" setup for this scheme, so if HMRC is able to attack it like this, there surely can't be a lot of hope for any of the other schemes of this nature...
As long as you have no dates and sums of money explicitly stated in the contracts the use of EBTs will be fine as there is case law in place to support the past use of EBT up until December 2010.
Leave a comment:
-
You'd have to expect that a company such as JPMorgan put some considerable effort into getting the "right" setup for this scheme, so if HMRC is able to attack it like this, there surely can't be a lot of hope for any of the other schemes of this nature...
Leave a comment:
-
More retrospection?
Well that may shift the balance.
If was DonkeyRhubarb and SantaClaus I'd get their PR/lobbying firm on the blower to JPM immediately - I can see a LOT of new joiners to NTRT!
Leave a comment:
-
More retrospection?
EBT's made illegal 2011 but JP Morgan and their staff have to repay tax and NI from 2005 EBT Ruling Hits Thousands of Banking StaffTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: