• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: PCG Draft Contract

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "PCG Draft Contract"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by bluwe
    "I doubt, for example, your employer is paying any more gross for your services than before."

    How do you work that out?.
    What other reason is there for him to support the change of you from employee to contractor? It absolves him of any responsibility for you, saves him administration, SSP provision and holiday pay and takes you out of scope of his insurances and pension provisions.

    Originally posted by bluwe
    "So sorry, mate, but you are why we real contractors have to manage IR35 in the first place."

    I haven't given my client a contract or taken any action yet so don't tar me with that brush.
    Well I will actually. Stopping work as an employee and the doing exactly the same thing as a contractor is precisely why we have IR35 and why the Dacas judgement has further screwed up our market by frightening clients with tales of contractors claiming employment rights.

    Put it another way - if you want to keep the same job, stay permanent: to do anything else makes little practical sense since all you are doing is giving away a degree of certainty for no real gain by the time you've covered off all the things that employees get. If you want to go freelance, do it properly

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Personally I wouldn't bother with the PCG contract. I use a small set of t's and c's for my direct clients and a 30 day payment term on my invoices.

    Seems to work...

    Leave a comment:


  • bluwe
    replied
    "I doubt, for example, your employer is paying any more gross for your services than before."

    How do you work that out?

    "So sorry, mate, but you are why we real contractors have to manage IR35 in the first place."

    I haven't given my client a contract or taken any action yet so don't tar me with that brush.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    No, what you are doing is tax evasion, not avoidance. There is no business reason for doing what you are doing other than it saves you tax - I doubt, for example, your employer is paying any more gross for your services than before.

    So sorry, mate, but you are why we real contractors have to manage IR35 in the first place. If you need more cash, either get a pay rise or go freelance properly, which means by yourself in the open market.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluwe
    replied
    I hear what you're saying. At the moment I'm using contracting as a means to an end, but I do want to be in it for the long term, so whilst option 2 is a ba**ard it definitely sounds the safest option in the long term.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by bluwe

    With regards the the potential for my employer to be investigated, it is common practice at the company I work for to re-employ people as contractors so they must be aware of potential implications.
    Given what you just said I would be very, very, carefull. All it will take is one investigation into one contractor there and the potential is for the whole lot to come down. They investigate a contractor, that leads to the company, that leads to everyone else working there in the same way. If I were you I'd take option two, minimise you're liabilities, and look to get out as soon as possible, then become a proper contractor if thats what you really want to do.

    Having said that check back tommorow and see if anyone else has any different opinions. Most people here have buggered off for the day.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluwe
    replied
    Thanks for that, Dave. I didn't realise the working practices would also be investigated. I'll have a think about how to proceed, bit of a catch 22!

    Cheers,

    James

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by bluwe
    Thanks for the reply. Nobody advised me to do this, but truth be told the rate on offer was the deciding factor. I was aware of the "Friday Monday" thing but I assumed you could protect yourself with a correctly worded contract containing a MOO clause, etc...
    It's not the contract thats important it's the actual working practices in place. You can have the best contract in the world for IR35 but if it's not an accurate reflection of whats really happening then you will still get shafted by the IR.

    Of the few cases the IR have won on IR35 at least one of them has been down to exactly the situation you are describing.

    As I see it you have two options.

    1. Go ahead as planned and hope you dont get investigated. It's unlikely but not beyond the realms of possibility. Work out what it would cost you if you are caught by IR35 and stick that money in the bank just in case. If you're only planning to stay on this job for 3 or 6 months the odds are probably in your favour.

    2. Count yourself as IR35 caught from day one and pay the Tax and NI. Look at it as the price of getting a foot in the door as a contractor. When you take your next contract you can make sure you get it done right.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluwe
    replied
    Thanks for the reply. Nobody advised me to do this, but truth be told the rate on offer was the deciding factor. I was aware of the "Friday Monday" thing but I assumed you could protect yourself with a correctly worded contract containing a MOO clause, etc...

    With regards the the potential for my employer to be investigated, it is common practice at the company I work for to re-employ people as contractors so they must be aware of potential implications.
    Last edited by bluwe; 13 June 2006, 21:12.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by bluwe
    Hi there,

    I'm after a bit of advice. I'm just about to start contracting at the company I have worked at for the last 18 months as a permanent employee. We've agreed a timescale and an hourly rate, but because of the nature of the work I do (3rd Line Network Support) I am struggling to fill in the blank sections (Service Definition, Deliverbales, Acceptance Criteria, etc) on the Schedule because I won't be working on a specific project, just providing support as and when required and installation expertise on a number of different projects. Effectively I'm unsure as to how to word these sections to ensure "IR35 Friendliness" whilst accurately reflecting my role.

    Can anyone help? I'm really stuck!

    Cheers,

    James

    Thats because you are doing precisely what IR35 was designed to prevent. Moving from Permie employee status to contracter status while retaining all the same working practices and to all intents and purposes behaving like a permanent employee.

    Should you be investigated you are going to find it very hard indeed to prove you are not caught by IR35.

    I have to ask who gave you the advice that this was a good thing to do? It's not only you that runs the risk of investigation, but the company you will be working for as well as if you are deemed to be an effective employee they may welll become liable for back dated employers NI etc as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • bluwe
    started a topic PCG Draft Contract

    PCG Draft Contract

    Hi there,

    I'm after a bit of advice. I'm just about to start contracting at the company I have worked at for the last 18 months as a permanent employee. We've agreed a timescale and an hourly rate, but because of the nature of the work I do (3rd Line Network Support) I am struggling to fill in the blank sections (Service Definition, Deliverbales, Acceptance Criteria, etc) on the Schedule because I won't be working on a specific project, just providing support as and when required and installation expertise on a number of different projects. Effectively I'm unsure as to how to word these sections to ensure "IR35 Friendliness" whilst accurately reflecting my role.

    Can anyone help? I'm really stuck!

    Cheers,

    James

Working...
X