• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IT Consultant in tax fraud case"

Collapse

  • BlasterBates
    replied
    I just read up briefly about Rangers FC, looks like that was also tax evasion, according to the reports I've been reading. i.e. it wasn't really a loan. Certainly they're being charged penalties. If that's the case I would be very very wary indeed of an EBT scheme.
    Last edited by BlasterBates; 23 April 2012, 15:00.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    More info here chaps High earner operated decade-long tax scam - Dumfries and Galloway Standard Seems as though this was actual evasion

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    "The tax system depends on people being honest but Maxwell consistently tried to conceal his income."

    They are hardly encouring that when they constantly blur the distinction between avoidance and evasion.
    I could agree with this to some extent in some cases but looking at the short paragraph that mentions a summary of his actions it doesn't look like this is someone using systems in good faith and being caught by a blur IMO. Would like to see the full transcript out of interest but there seems to be consistent and sustained attempt to evade tax here. Obviously this is on the HMRC site so has a reporting bias to it though.....

    Between 1999 and 2008 Maxwell worked as an IT consultant for City of London banks. Fees were paid to companies - of which he was a hidden beneficiary - registered in Gibraltar and the Isle of Man. From 2005 the income was paid to a UK registered company which never made any tax returns.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamJarST
    replied
    What is not clear to me from that is how much of the evasion was due to using an offshore solution and how much was due to not declaring any income in the UK company.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Bet he's wishing he just went brolly now isn't he.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by deckster View Post
    Plus 13 years interest, plus potentially 100% penalty. I'd be stunned if the final bill was less than a million.
    And more so if the Exchequer will see any of it...

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    "The tax system depends on people being honest but Maxwell consistently tried to conceal his income."

    They are hardly encouring that when they constantly blur the distinction between avoidance and evasion.

    Leave a comment:


  • deckster
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Isn't his bill £635,015 as detailed at the bottom?
    Plus 13 years interest, plus potentially 100% penalty. I'd be stunned if the final bill was less than a million.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    A "scheme" that worked perfectly well for 10 years.

    So he's going to have bill of somewhere between £1 mill and £2 mill and presumably a few months in the "clink".

    Effectively after a long career in IT he'll be worse off than he was before he started.

    Well he isn't the only one.
    Isn't his bill £635,015 as detailed at the bottom?

    2. During the period 06 April 1999 - 05 April 2008 the total loss to the exchequer was £635,015

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    A "scheme" that worked perfectly well for 10 years.

    So he's going to have bill of somewhere between £1 mill and £2 mill and presumably a few months in the "clink".

    Effectively after a long career in IT he'll be worse off than he was before he started.

    Well he isn't the only one.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    started a topic IT Consultant in tax fraud case

    IT Consultant in tax fraud case

    News : NDS
Working...
X