Originally posted by davetza
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Legitmate offshore structures and HMRC
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Legitmate offshore structures and HMRC"
Collapse
-
Yes. There are a couple of things I am working on that are not my services. t'internet type stuff. Multi-currency revenue.
-
Are you sure you properly understand the tax benefits of having an offshore company. As has been stated before work that is done in the UK must be taxed in the UK.
One of the the ways big companies like Google and Amazon use offshore companies is to assign all the rights for IP to the offshore companies and then these companies "charge" the onshore companies for the rights to use the IP. So if you have some IP you have developed and can license then this would be an option but there is not much benefit if you are just doing work for someone.
Leave a comment:
-
The very brief answer to your question is - without knowing the exact details it is impossible to comment, the variables are infiniteOriginally posted by prozak View PostGood points.
I wouldn't be resident but I would be working offshore.
Leave a comment:
-
Good points.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThe main question is, what would your "business activity" be that would be taxable in an offshore location when you're not resident there, not working there and trading in another country?
I would be questioning yourself on that, because if you're in the UK and doing the work there, or in the other country you'd be expected to pay tax either in the UK or that other country, even if you aren't there for 183 days most countries still expect you to pay tax on business and trading activities.
If you're resident and working in the offshore location no-one is going to question it.
I would be resident and I would be working offshore.
Leave a comment:
-
The main question is, what would your "business activity" be that would be taxable in an offshore location when you're not resident there, not working there and trading in another country?
I would be questioning yourself on that, because if you're in the UK and doing the work there, or in the other country you'd be expected to pay tax either in the UK or that other country, even if you aren't there for 183 days most countries still expect you to pay tax on business and trading activities.
If you're resident and working in the offshore location no-one is going to question it.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes I had read that somewhere also. That is not necessarily an issue. If taxes are due I am happy to pay them.Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostIf you're resident here, and carry out the management of the offshore company here, then HMRC may be interested in that company from a CT point of view. Best to get specialist advice from an accountant on this one, the country you chose to incorporate the new company in could have a bearing on treatment (double tax treaties etc).
The main issue is that revealing the whole structure removes the anonymity of the offshore structure which removes the additional benefit of asset protection.
Perhaps I need a new company.....
Leave a comment:
-
If you're resident here, and carry out the management of the offshore company here, then HMRC may be interested in that company from a CT point of view. Best to get specialist advice from an accountant on this one, the country you chose to incorporate the new company in could have a bearing on treatment (double tax treaties etc).
Leave a comment:
-
Legitmate offshore structures and HMRC
Afternoon Chaps.
I want to set up an offshore company to develop some business ideas and enable me to more easily trade across various countries outside of the EU.
I currently have a UK Ltd Co that although it was set up for other purposes I use for contracting.
I want to have my UK company a wholly owned subsidiary of the offshore company and pay dividends to it.
Obviously hector is going to be interested in this arrangement as it might be considered avoidance or even evasion?. However, any dividends I pay myself from offshore co. will be duly declared on my personal self assessment.
One issue is that I currently do not pay myself dividends beyond the 40% tax threshold, but it would of course be possible to pay the offshore company all the profit.
What will HMRC think of this arrangement?
What if I only pay my offshore Co. the amount I have been paying to myself? Any difference in HMRC attitude then? - i.e. HMRC will be getting the exact same amount of tax from me.
Thanks.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26

Leave a comment: