Originally posted by ChimpMaster
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: ESC C16 - Company Closure
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "ESC C16 - Company Closure"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Greg@CapitalCity View Post<snip>
Once the concession is granted, the HMRC's letter back to you usually states something along the lines that you can use ESC C16 so long as you don't then transfer any of the existing company assets into a new company, or become a shareholder of a new company that essentially does what the old company did. Basically just a reminder to act lawfully.
Another situation that HMRC have left very much ambiguous.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wary View PostThanks Greg although if that truly is a definitive list of the assurances required, then it rather implies that it would be legit to set up a new company the following day. Hence I presume that there must be more assurances than this?
The assurances above are pretty much it. You can add the additional ones Clare has mentioned, but the HMRC shouldn't approve the ESC C16 if they apply anyway - good for completeness though.
Once the concession is granted, the HMRC's letter back to you usually states something along the lines that you can use ESC C16 so long as you don't then transfer any of the existing company assets into a new company, or become a shareholder of a new company that essentially does what the old company did. Basically just a reminder to act lawfully.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis View PostThanks Claire, I hadn't read about the "additional assurances" before.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Claire, I hadn't read about the "additional assurances" before.
Leave a comment:
-
There's some good background here:
To obtain clearance, the wording of ESC C16 requires the directors and shareholders of the company to submit signed assurances that:
“The company:
• Does not intend to trade or carry on business in future; and
• Intends to collect its debts, pay off its creditors and distribute any balance of its assets to its shareholders (or has already done so; and
• Intends to seek or accept striking off and dissolution.
The company and shareholders also agree that:
•They will supply such information as is necessary to determine, and will pay, any corporation tax liability on income or capital gains; and
•The shareholders will pay any capital gains tax liability (or corporation tax in the case of a corporate shareholder) in respect of any amount distributed to them in cash or otherwise as if the distributions had been made in a winding up.”
In practice we are increasingly seeing HMRC asking for two additional assurances to be made.
1) That the company is not the subject of an investigation; and
2) That the company is not one which, if the distributions were made in a winding up, would be reported to the Anti-Avoidance Group, Clearance and Counteraction Team in respect of Transactions in Securities [ITA 2007, S684] in respect of the following:
• Transfers or sales of the company’s assets or business to another company with some or all of the same shareholders followed by the winding up of the former company or sale of its shares.
• Capital receipts by the company’s shareholders following a demerger or reconstruction from the sale or liquidation of one demerged company where the same shareholders return an interest via another company party to the transaction.
This second additional assurance attempts to overcome the mischief known as ‘Phoenix companies’ and is most likely the reason why the current draft legislation has the £4,000 distribution limit imposed. To make the application as efficient as possible, it is recommended that the additional assurances are included in the initial application.
ESC C16
CTM36875 - Particular topics: Transactions in securities: Identification of cases and submission to AAG Clearance & Counteraction Team
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lewis View PostSo do you make your clients write something along the lines of "I don't intend to continue the same trade under a new company."? When I looked into this, I was told the assurance (that relates to this point) you have to give is that the company will cease to trade.
The problem seemed to me not to do with getting the ESC 16 concession and the assurances you have to make, but more to some vagueness that you cannot close a company and open a new one for a tax advantage, but I don't have any references to where this is stated (it was posted on this forum somewhere).
The problem is not with closing a company and starting again, but that HMRC could withdraw the concession and challenge the CGT treatment unless there is a genuine commercial reason for closure.Last edited by Clare@InTouch; 1 November 2011, 12:08.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostIn my experience HMRC will only grant the ESC if you supply a statutory declaration giving such assurance.
The problem seemed to me not to do with getting the ESC 16 concession and the assurances you have to make, but more to some vagueness that you cannot close a company and open a new one for a tax advantage, but I don't have any references to where this is stated (it was posted on this forum somewhere).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Greg@CapitalCity View PostThe assurances you would typically make are that the company:
• Does not intend to trade or carry on business in the future;
• Intends to collect its debts, pay off its creditors and distribute any balance of its assets to its shareholders (or has already done so); and
• Intends to seek or accept striking off and dissolution.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wary View PostI had heard that you only have to justify that it is your current intent not to set up another company, so it is still possible to legitimately trade in the future but obviously not straight away.
• Does not intend to trade or carry on business in the future;
• Intends to collect its debts, pay off its creditors and distribute any balance of its assets to its shareholders (or has already done so); and
• Intends to seek or accept striking off and dissolution.
There is no problem if you intend to keep working on the same contract through a brolly.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wary View PostI'm an IT contractor and am about to start a new contract. There are reasons why I'd like to close down my old company & start a new one, the most obvious being to take advantage of the ESC C16 concession.
Check out the sticky in welcome-faqs and you will see what the trick is for searching for these terms.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wary View PostThanks Clare. I had heard that you only have to justify that it is your current intent not to set up another company, so it is still possible to legitimately trade in the future but obviously not straight away.
You mention going brolly for 6 months. Can one legitimately close their company using ESC C16 but carry on doing the same work (maybe the same contract) through an umbrella company? Or is it more a case of HMRC being less likely to find out?
Plus have a Google on the Ramsay principle. Hector may well think this applies.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostIn my experience HMRC will only grant the ESC if you supply a statutory declaration giving such assurance. You could of course always lie, and they'd only find out if they actually checked, but you'd run the risk of the income being reallocated as a dividend and end up with a big tax bill plus penalties and interest.
If you really want to do it, why not close and go brolly for 6 months, or take a long extended holiday. The ESC declaration doesn't mean you can never trade again, you just need to be able to demonstrate a commercial reason for closing.
You mention going brolly for 6 months. Can one legitimately close their company using ESC C16 but carry on doing the same work (maybe the same contract) through an umbrella company? Or is it more a case of HMRC being less likely to find out?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Leave a comment:
-
In my experience HMRC will only grant the ESC if you supply a statutory declaration giving such assurance. You could of course always lie, and they'd only find out if they actually checked, but you'd run the risk of the income being reallocated as a dividend and end up with a big tax bill plus penalties and interest.
If you really want to do it, why not close and go brolly for 6 months, or take a long extended holiday. The ESC declaration doesn't mean you can never trade again, you just need to be able to demonstrate a commercial reason for closing.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: