• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Help with tax? - Seems I got charged more than a small county"

Collapse

  • MrRobin
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    you sure?
    the calculations when you click through all show 44 weeks
    I stand corrected. Apols.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Not quite. I think that is the salary you need to earn to receive the same cash in your pocket as you would receive from that £40 an hour contract.
    Surely thats what you should be using as a bench mark when comparing salary with contractor rates

    Being paid more but loosing the extra pay and more in tax hardly benefits me.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Not quite. I think that is the salary you need to earn to receive the same cash in your pocket as you would receive from that £40 an hour contract.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 23 December 2017, 19:48.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamJarST
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    you sure?
    the calculations when you click through all show 44 weeks
    That was my impression too. I think the 1/1000 formula assumes inside IR35 or using an Umbrella, but I could be wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • CU63
    replied
    Direct from HMRC website -

    The emergency tax code is set each year and is a number followed by the letter L. The number is the basic Personal Allowance (£7,475 for the tax 2011-12) divided by 10. The emergency code for 2011-12 is therefore 747L.

    Depending on how it's worked out, you might also see '747L W1' or 747L M1' (meaning 'Week 1' or 'Month 1' - whereby you get a proportion of the Personal Allowance over the remainder of the tax year).

    747L also happens to be the tax code you’ll get if you are entitled to just the basic Personal Allowance but in this case it is not an emergency code and you will receive the right amount of tax-free pay. See the section ‘When you might be put on an emergency tax code’ to help you decide whether the emergency tax code might apply to you.

    When you might be put on an emergency tax code

    You might get an emergency tax code if:
    • you've started a new job and haven't got a P45 from your previous employer for the same tax year
    • you've started your first job since the start of the tax year and haven't been receiving any taxable state benefits or a state or company pension
    • you've started a new job but you've had another job or other jobs or received taxable state benefits during the year
    • you've started a new job and were previously self-employed
    • there's been a change in your tax code during the year because, for example, you've started to get company benefits or the State Pension

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    That assumes working 52 weeks a year though.
    you sure?
    the calculations when you click through all show 44 weeks

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by kingcook View Post
    Yes -- you are getting ripped off

    For the client/agent to be paying you £90/day, they are taking the piss. Mind you, each to their own. Personally if i got offered that rate i would laugh in their face and choose to go on the dole.
    This is not what the question is about. He's asking if the deductions for tax, etc, are too high, not if his rate is too low.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wanderer
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    The 1/1000 conversion is mentioned quite a bit but it's very flawed in my opinion. OK, it's easy to use as it's a nice round figure but I think a more realistic number is 1/1250 and that still takes into account blah blah blah
    People feel the need to keep asking a question that there is no answer to so if anyone has to ask the answer is:

    Hourly rate contacting = permie salary / 1000

    But you know what? That answer is completely wrong. There is no "the answer". There is no simple formula. We can debate it ad-infinitum but we have no clue about some random person's personal circumstances, nor do we give a tulip so there is no way we can answer the question properly. Even if we did we probably still couldn't answer the question.

    Now what you are doing is figuring out your own formula and good luck to you. Everyone has to work it out for themselves. However, if anyone asks then we just give them the /1000 formula above and be happy.

    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    Ask yourself this... if you were earning £50ph on a contract and the client offered you a perm role at £50k or if not, to continue on your contract, would you be interested from a financial point of view?
    No, of course not. You have made the fatal mistake of thinking that the permie to contract formula is reversible to create a contract to permie calculator. It's not.

    The contract to permie calculator is:

    Hourly rate contacting * 2000 = permie salary

    And that's wrong too, but once again clients feel the need to ask "how much will you want to go permie" and so if they have to ask then that is the answer....

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    That assumes working 52 weeks a year though.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 23 December 2017, 19:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    The 1/1000 conversion is mentioned quite a bit but it's very flawed in my opinion. OK, it's easy to use as it's a nice round figure but I think a more realistic number is 1/1250 and that still takes into account a fair bit of bench/holiday time, ltd company pension contributions, company fees etc etc.

    I.e. £50,000 perm = £40ph contracting
    gives a salary of £72k to match contracting at £40ph
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 23 December 2017, 19:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    Hi Mr Monkey,

    I have put your gross pay through our calculator and I cannot see how tax and NIC's contributions can be anywhere near £689.00 for the month; I have made no assumptions for expenses and total tax and NI comes in at £444.00. The only thing I can think is that maybe you had underpaid tax through a previous employer and when your P45 figures were entered into your umbrella company's systems an adjustment was made - do you have your P45 figures to hand??
    Did you do the calculations on a Week 1 basis? Maybe Mr Monkey hadn't / still hasn't yet submitted a P45.

    It could aso be a good ole fashioned mistake...

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    No but I wouldn't be interested in it at £63,000 either.
    Fair enough. What about £80k? That's a conversion of 1/1600...

    You see why 1/1000 is rather silly

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    It's not about underselling, it's about working out what is the equivalent perm salary to contracting rate to be able to compare potential work offers.

    Ask yourself this... if you were earning £50ph on a contract and the client offered you a perm role at £50k or if not, to continue on your contract, would you be interested from a financial point of view?
    No but I wouldn't be interested in it at £63,000 either.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Why undersell yourself unless you are a Bob or desperate.
    It's not about underselling, it's about working out what is the equivalent perm salary to contracting rate to be able to compare potential work offers.

    Ask yourself this... if you were earning £50ph on a contract and the client offered you a perm role at £50k or if not, to continue on your contract, would you be interested from a financial point of view?

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    The 1/1000 conversion is mentioned quite a bit but it's very flawed in my opinion. OK, it's easy to use as it's a nice round figure but I think a more realistic number is 1/1250 and that still takes into account a fair bit of bench/holiday time, ltd company pension contributions, company fees etc etc.

    I.e. £50,000 perm = £40ph contracting

    Why undersell yourself unless you are a Bob or desperate.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X