Originally posted by heyindy
View Post
As malvolio says, each contract would be judged on it's merits in an investigation but I don't think they are going to bother investigating someone who has worked with multiple clients. They would be pretty hard pressed to argue that you were a "disguised permanent employee" if you did (say) 20 different jobs in a year.
No, what they are after is the big fish - the ones who take on a contract and work for 3 years with a single client as a 9-5 worker.Firstly, No permie would work on the basis of a week's work here and there. There is no mutuality of obligation and that's the silver bullet against IR35.
Secondly, make sure the contract with the client makes it clear that your company will do the job (not you personally). ie you could subcontract it out (to India if you wanted to). Right of substitution, that's an IR35 silver bullet too.
Thirdly, they don't dictate where, when and how you do the work. They spec it, you quote for it and do it when and how you want. There is no control so that's a sliver bullet too.
Fourthly, if you give them a quote to do a piece of work at a fixed price, supply your own equipment and work from home then you have an even stronger case. Get it done early, you make a profit. Mess it up and you make a loss. That's a strong IR35 pointer.
It sounds to me like the IR35 specialist company doesn't quite understand how you will be working from your limited explanation. I don't think you have anything to worry about... If it bothers you then phone them back and explain in detail, dropping in the points I mentioned above (presuming they reflect the way you will work). They will then understand that you are outside IR35.

)
Leave a comment: