A while back I finished 9 months at a client. It was initially a 3 month contract, renewed for another 3 months, then 3 lots of 1 month renewal.
Each time the agency contract specified 12 month restriction against going direct by a number of devious means.
I very much doubt 12 months is enforceable on this basis.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "terms regarding 4 months after expiry of contract agreement"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostSeems reasonable to me. What's the problem? If you don't like something - start negotiating.
The thing to remember is that if you don't properly opt out of the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations then the most they can hold you to is 14 weeks from the start of the contract or 8 weeks from the end (which ever is the longer of the two).
Now does this mean that this section of the contract is invalid and they couldn't enforce it? Or does it mean that they can say "OK then, make it 8 weeks"?
I just sign contracts these days, it's such a lot of ball ache arguing the point with these muppets. If it comes to the crunch, I'd see them in court and argue the legality with a restraint of trade defence or if it's really bad, just pheonix the company and they can sue the defunct one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dkldn View PostIt's 12 month contract. Maybe I misunderstood it. Initially I thought it meant that I can't get another job with the same client through other agency in the first 4 months after expiry of this contract.
If you are opted in, then the restriction isn't valid, though.
Leave a comment:
-
Standard stuff I am afraid. Seen it in nearly every contract I have had in some shape or forum. One comforting fact is I have seen many people leave and come back with diff client or left perman and come back as contractor and this has never been enforced. Been some upset people but I have yet to see it actually affect anyone.
At the end of the day until someone pays a lawer and takes you to court it is just words on a piece of paper. There are ways around it through negotiation as well let alone the brute for approach
Leave a comment:
-
It's 12 month contract. Maybe I misunderstood it. Initially I thought it meant that I can't get another job with the same client through other agency in the first 4 months after expiry of this contract.
Leave a comment:
-
If it's a 24 month contract, why wouldn't it be reasonable? What's reasonable and what's unenforceable depends upon the contract as a whole. If the role is only 3 months long it's another story. If you are concerned about it you should have the entire contract reviewed.
Note that if you haven't opted out of the relevant employment regs, most of that clause isn't enforceable (you're limited to an 8 week exclusivity period). Agents tend to avoid telling you this when encouraging you to opt-out. If you've already met the client before signing an opt-out the opt-out is invalid.
Leave a comment:
-
Seems reasonable to me. What's the problem? If you don't like something - start negotiating.
Leave a comment:
-
terms regarding 4 months after expiry of contract agreement
My contract agreement (section listed below) with an agent has the following restriction for the first 4 months after termination or expiry of the contract. I don't feel it's reasonable for the 4 months restriction. Is it a standard practice or not?
8. Protection of AgencyXYZ’s Business
8.1. The Supplier shall not, and shall procure that the Consultant shall not, alone or jointly
with another or others in any capacity and whether or not for its or his benefit prior to
the expiry of four calendar months after the termination or expiry of this Agreement:
8.1.1. approach the Client for a permanent position or temporary engagement or enter into
a permanent position or temporary engagement with the Client (or similarly/likewise
with any member of the Client Group if any such permanent position or temporary
engagement was or could be gained as a result of the provision of Services in the
course of this Agreement);
8.1.2. enter into any arrangement whatsoever (other than via AgencyXYZ) to provide services
of the same or similar nature to the Services with the Client (or any member of the
Client Group if any such arrangement was or could be gained as a result of the
provision of Services in the course of this Agreement);
8.1.3. directly or indirectly induce (or seek to induce) to leave or cease performing
service(s) for any member of the AgencyXYZ Group or Client Group, any contractor or
employee of any member of the AgencyXYZ Group or Client Group with which or whom
the Supplier or Consultant had material contact in the course of its, his or their
supply of the Services at any time in the six months prior to such termination or
expiry;
8.2. The Supplier shall not, and shall procure that the Consultant shall not, alone or jointly
with another or others in any capacity and whether or not for its or his benefit at any
time use the name “AgencyXYZ” or “AgencyXYZ Associates” or any other business name used
at any time by any member of the AgencyXYZ Group or Client Group for the purposes of a
business similar to or competing with any business carried on by any member of the
AgencyXYZ Group or Client Group.
8.3. Having regard to the nature of the business carried out by the Client and any member
of the Client Group and to the legitimate business interests and goodwill of AgencyXYZ, the
parties accept that the scope and extent of the restrictions contained within Clause
8 are both reasonable and necessary to protect the legitimate business interests
and goodwill of AgencyXYZ.
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: