• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Do you think this is legitimate?"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    Yes there is a risk, and it's a question of how much you want to take on board. The problem is, many of the people looking to join these schemes are not competent to do that risk assessment, and there is very little in the public domain - apart from assorted victims and evangelists - on which they can make that assessment. The schemes are mainly built around high net-worth individuals with decent levels of professional advice available to them.

    There is also a very strong focus from HMRC on what they term "unacceptable avoidance", which is not you and me running a small LtdCo but the use of these schemes in general. With around £7bn at stake it is unlikely that focus will go away any time soon, no matter which wally ends up in No 10, and it is equally unlikely that HMRC will see joining one at this stage as a sound business decision.

    Hence the best advice is probably to stay well clear and stick with what we know works. But hey, it's your money, house and marriage, not mine...

    Leave a comment:


  • Vallah
    replied
    Anyway, like most of the schemes, it is legitimate, it just depends on your appetite for risk. The Montpelier BN66 case has obviously put a lot of people off, but there are still lots of people using various schemes. I suppose in time they may be challenegd, but then again, maybe not.
    Last edited by Vallah; 19 March 2010, 11:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Even if you are caught (highly unlikely but it does happen), you take out more through a LtdCo than you ever will through a brolly.

    Have a read of this to see why: <snip>

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Seriously, you need to set up a Ltd Co. The chances are, IMO that you will be outside IR35 given a half decent contract and half decent working practices. Take advice from the likes of QDOS and others who specialise in this field. EBT's are to be avoided at all cost, IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wanderer
    replied
    Originally posted by nodric View Post
    If you are loosing 56% of your income, I'd suggest finding another Umbrella quickly, or spending some of the extra retained income on a good accountant, and setting yourself up as LTD!
    It depends on your income, but if it's around 500/day then that's how much tax you pay through an umbrella.

    I would suggest the OP does some research into IR35 to figure out if you are in or out. If you are out, then setup a limited company and 6,000 a year in salary and the rest in dividends.

    Don't get involved in these dodgy EBTs or offshore schemes. See the BN66 sticky for an example of what can happen with them....

    Leave a comment:


  • Tarquin Farquhar
    replied
    Originally posted by nodric View Post
    If you are loosing 56% of your income, ...
    Normally I would point out that
    "losing" is what happens to something that you had but don't have any more,and
    "loosing" is what you do to something when you let go of it, so that it can run or fly away.

    But in this case you may be right.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkOD
    replied
    putting it bluntly..............run run run run run run! which is what you'll be doing eventually when the tax man gets in contact asking why you're money has been going offshorre when you're clearly a UK resident who should be paying UK tax!

    Are you sure your return is accurate BTW? seems ridiculously low!

    Leave a comment:


  • JimBobTwoTeeth
    replied
    If you are considering an EBT the key thing is that they should have agreed their scheme with HMRC. And even then there are examples of them still going after people.

    Leave a comment:


  • nodric
    replied
    Originally posted by Fat Dave View Post
    44% - are you serious?
    If you are loosing 56% of your income, I'd suggest finding another Umbrella quickly, or spending some of the extra retained income on a good accountant, and setting yourself up as LTD!

    What sort of fees are they charging you?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Walk away. They're telling porkies. Seriously.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vallah
    replied
    They're not an Umbrella Company, you become an employee and receive loans from an EBT.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fat Dave
    replied
    44% - are you serious?

    Leave a comment:


  • bit stuck
    started a topic Do you think this is legitimate?

    Do you think this is legitimate?

    I’ve been working with an umbrella company for over a year taking home 44% of my day rate, but obviously benefiting from the expenses policy and being encouraged to claim for the maximise expenses allowances.

    I’ve seen this company advertised called AML ([mod ] URL snipped [/mod]) whom claim to be able to give you 80% return on your hourly rate they state

    “Welcome to AML For contractors seeking the benefits of employment combined with the freedom, flexibility and financial rewards of contracting.
    Enabling you to take-home over 80% of your income, AML provides a real employment alternative for contractors who don't want the administrative burden of self employment or working through a PAYE umbrella company structure. AML's employment service is IR35 and s660 compliant and is endorsed by leading Tax Counsel and Employment Counsel"

    How legitimate is this?

    If they are an umbrella company why arn't my existing offering a simular deal?

    I don’t want the hassle of my own LTD Company but want a better return than 44% + expenses.

    What would you advise I do?

    Thanks for your advise

Working...
X