OK, it looks like we don't agree and I am probably wrong.
If anyone is interested the full lowdown is here.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/exb/overview/basics.htm
I remain to be convinced that if HMRC are investigating your tax return and determine that you have received an expense repayment that should have been treated as salary that they will at the same reassess your employers' NI returns, but ho hum.
The intricacies of the UK tax system are so not my problem any more and I should refrain from commenting in the future.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Expense Claim after 2 years with same (not sure) end client"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Gonzo View PostEh?
HMRC distinguish between- Expenses - which are not taxed
- Benefits in Kind - which are taxed
So the risk for the contractor is that anything that yourCo has refunded you as an expense could be disallowed by HMRC and reclassified a Benefit in Kind and therefore tax is due.
Surely the risk for the contractor is for it to be treated as a net salary payment; net salary attracts class 1 NIC, Class 1a NIC and tax whereas a BIK attracts only Tax and Class 1a NIC.
Tigerinhunt what has your accountant said about this?
a) Treat it as a BIK
b) Treat it as a Net Salary payment
Robot
Leave a comment:
-
I think that we agree, we are just disagreeing about the reasons why we agree.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Robot View PostThis is not a BIK as HMR&C see this as ordinary commuting, and as the employer is paying the employees travel HMR&C see this as net salary. So PAYE, Employees and Employers NIC is payable.
HMRC distinguish between- Expenses - which are not taxed
- Benefits in Kind - which are taxed
So the risk for the contractor is that anything that yourCo has refunded you as an expense could be disallowed by HMRC and reclassified a Benefit in Kind and therefore tax is due.
I think that we agree, we are just disagreeing about the reasons why we agree.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gonzo View PostEDIT - Actually, you should have stopped claiming travel the moment that you found out you would be at this site for two years or be prepared to pay tax on the BIK.
Leave a comment:
-
Client is irelevent, it's the location that matters. if we're talking about contractors in London then that's another can of worms
Leave a comment:
-
/Yawn . Like this has never been asked before. Search search search..
Also as you probably won't use the search have a look at Malvolio's blog which has an interesting article on this..
http://www.lpwcs.com/wordpress/
In a nutshell new company doesn't matter. If it is in the same geographic area it counts. The idea is that if you are going to work in a different area to which you live 2 years was deemed a reasonable amount of time before you would relocate there.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tigerinhunt View Post...
What do the knowledgeable and experts think here? Please suggest.
...
If you don't trust your accountant's advice, then get a new one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tigerinhunt View PostHi,
Soon I will be starting my 3rd year with the same group and my accountant has advised that I wont be able to claim travel and subsistence expenses any more.
However point to note is that new contract is going to be with different end client (read company) as compared to previous 2 years. I will be working with different team at a different location within the same building.
I think because contractually and factually I am going to work for a different company (It is a separate legal entity) even if it is part of the same business group, it should be considered as a different client. My accountant says that because it is same location, I cannot claim above two kinds of expenses.
What do the knowledgeable and experts think here? Please suggest.
Thanks in advace.
Regards,
tigerinhunt
However, the temporary workplace refers to your travel to the location and not the company that you work for and a move within the same building is unlikely to cut it.
Sorry. Your accountant is correct.
EDIT - Actually, you should have stopped claiming travel the moment that you found out you would be at this site for two years or be prepared to pay tax on the BIK.
Leave a comment:
-
there are other threads covering similar questions, verdict seems to be it is the location that counts.
Leave a comment:
-
Expense Claim after 2 years with same (not sure) end client
Hi,
Soon I will be starting my 3rd year with the same group and my accountant has advised that I wont be able to claim travel and subsistence expenses any more.
However point to note is that new contract is going to be with different end client (read company) as compared to previous 2 years. I will be working with different team at a different location within the same building.
I think because contractually and factually I am going to work for a different company (It is a separate legal entity) even if it is part of the same business group, it should be considered as a different client. My accountant says that because it is same location, I cannot claim above two kinds of expenses.
What do the knowledgeable and experts think here? Please suggest.
Thanks in advace.
Regards,
tigerinhuntTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: