• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Bad debts and CT

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bad debts and CT"

Collapse

  • Friendly Accountant
    replied
    Bad debts

    If you don't believe that you are ever going to get paid, you can provide for the bad debts in your accounts and not pay tax on these amounts.

    If you think you will eventually get paid, the income stays in your accounts and you do pay tax. Obviously there is a degree of judgement here and as long as you can demonstrate that you had good reasons for writing off the debts you shouldn't have a problem with HMRC.

    As xoggoth says, if you ultimately do get paid, the amounts come back into income at that time.

    You may also want to consider the VAT position on these. There is a specific time test for claiming VAT back - if the debts are over 6 months old, you don't think you will be paid, and you write the amounts off in your accounts, you can claim back VAT previously paid to HMRC in respect of those invoices.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Unfortunately, slow paying is often a sign of a company in trouble for obvious cash flow reasons. I would be wary of supplying more goods/services to them.

    Our bad debts have been very small previously but I suspect one "slow payer" is about to go under owing us quite a few hundred, as we have been told their shop has closed. When I was contracting I lost about £1500 when a consistently "slow payer" went into receivership.

    "On its own" is important I think. It is not just about time but effort one is supposed to put in to trying to recover money. If one has phoned, written letters requesting payment and they have had no result.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 10 June 2009, 21:17.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Thanks for the advice. This would appear to be relevant:

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/BIM42710.htm
    Slow payers
    If the debtor is habitually a slow payer, and there are no grounds to believe his financial position has changed, then we would not accept that the length of time a debt has been outstanding is on its own sufficient reason to regard it as doubtful. A provision made on these grounds cannot be considered as being ‘estimated to be bad'.
    The client in this case has been a slow payer from day one, so it seems the continuation of slow paying isn't enough justification.

    But I'm sure Xoggoth is also correct in saying it's unlikely to be challenged as long as you're reasonable about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Accruals is normal but if there is genuine uncertainty if it will be paid I see no reason not to write it off, you can always put it back later if you get it.

    In my plan B company I put a note to the accounts on writing off policy and the amount written off. It is also explicitly shown as a deduction in the non statutory long profit and loss at the end which you can format how you like.

    If the taxman wants to challenge it he can, he hasn't yet.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 10 June 2009, 20:12.

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Yes that was my understanding, and everything I've read on the subject suggests that is the case. I found somewhere on the web an HMRC document talking about considering a "cash accounting" scheme for CT for small business, but it doesn't seem to have happened. In this case I'll have to pay out more than half of the company funds in CT, but you can see in extreme cases how the lack of cash accounting for CT could cause a small business to completely run out of cash even though technically they're profitable.
    This might help.

    http://www.howto.co.uk/business/book...oubtful_debts/

    It does sort of imply you can post it to a liability account as soon as it becomes doubtful. If it becomes "unbad" at some point you simply post it back - increaing profit in that year.

    From the horse mouth, but it's a fair bit to wade through.

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/BIM42700.htm
    Last edited by ASB; 10 June 2009, 18:57.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    To clarify what Malvolio said I think he is entirely wrong. Your accounts are prepared on an accruals basis thus all invoices produced are counted - as should be any work in progress.
    Yes that was my understanding, and everything I've read on the subject suggests that is the case. I found somewhere on the web an HMRC document talking about considering a "cash accounting" scheme for CT for small business, but it doesn't seem to have happened. In this case I'll have to pay out more than half of the company funds in CT, but you can see in extreme cases how the lack of cash accounting for CT could cause a small business to completely run out of cash even though technically they're profitable.

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    To clarify what Malvolio said I think he is entirely wrong. Your accounts are prepared on an accruals basis thus all invoices produced are counted - as should be any work in progress.

    This does cause a problem in that you are going to be paying CT on the outstanding amounts of notional profit (the invoices are a current asset). However you can get relief when the debt is eventually written off. There is a process available to enable you to take a charge against bad or doubtful debts, but what constitues due diligence in this case is unknown to me. [This would then give the outcome Malvolio said]

    Since you don't want to ask an accountant you could try HMRC. You can sometimes get quite a lot sense out of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    CT is paid on profit. If you haven't had the income, you haven't made a profit, so there's no CT to pay. You carry the bad debt across into next year, if it's paid then fine, it it isn't you again reduce your total profit by that amount.

    There are, however, other technical considerations about how long you do this and some other imapcts (bad debts are technically an asset). So sorry, but you need an accountant...

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    started a topic Bad debts and CT

    Bad debts and CT

    This is for PlanB co, and PlanB co cannot afford an accountant, so please don't suggest asking one ;-)

    I have to do a CT return, which as I understand it is based on the amount invoiced, not the amount that's been paid. But in this case there are quite a few invoices unpaid from the one near-death client, and I'm not at all confident of ever seeing the money.

    Presumably if the client had gone bust, then I'd be okay to write off those invoices as bad debts and not pay the CT. But is there some kind of minimum stage where I can treat the debt as bad? E.g. if unpaid for 6 months can I treat it as a bad debt, and then what happens if the client does eventually pay up?

    I understand I will eventually get the CT refunded even if I pay what turns out to be too much for this year.

    Thanks for any words of wisdom.
Working...
X