• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Possibly a very stupid question about IR35"

Collapse

  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    isn't reinvesting money within the business a definite pointer to being a proper business?

    Of course if the money just sits there and does nothing then you probably won't have a leg to stand on
    It may be a pointer but it is not an absolute pointer. You could have a caught contract even if the rest of the business is genuine. Ignore what is uttered by the government (you have heard the expression lies, damned lies and anything uttered by a New Labour Politician?).

    Mind you what is suggested above is not the best way of dealing with it. You could for example pay some money into a pension. This is subtracted from the deemed salary calculation. Then of course is the entire money from a caught contract. Money paid for actual salary is also deducted from the deemed salary. Kinda handy if the amount from a caught contract is less than the salary you would pay - there is no deemed salary payment to make.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    isn't reinvesting money within the business a definite pointer to being a proper business?
    You'd think so, but then we always hear that IR35 is on a contract by contract basis, and if having two contracts is no defence, then two seperate areas of business isn't either.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
    OK I understand about IR35 being a "working conditions" rules based tax etc...
    I hope the etc. refers to the actual written contracts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Yes: you pay the tax on all the income to the company (well 95% of it). It doesn't matter whether you've paid it to yourself or not.

    So potentially you could be working an IR35'd contract to fund other parts of the business, so paying yourself much less. You'd then be taxed on money you haven't earned.
    isn't reinvesting money within the business a definite pointer to being a proper business?

    Of course if the money just sits there and does nothing then you probably won't have a leg to stand on

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
    i.e. Do they only look at the overall £100k "income" that you as an individual earns?
    Yes: you pay the tax on all the income to the company (well 95% of it). It doesn't matter whether you've paid it to yourself or not.

    So potentially you could be working an IR35'd contract to fund other parts of the business, so paying yourself much less. You'd then be taxed on money you haven't earned.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    started a topic Possibly a very stupid question about IR35

    Possibly a very stupid question about IR35

    OK I understand about IR35 being a "working conditions" rules based tax etc but I was just thinking about the following.

    Assume your Ltd grosses say £100k a year but you only pay yourself a salary of say 20k, and leave the remainer in the Ltd. You never pay yourself a dividend.

    Now if HMRC came and slapped you with the IR35 badge, would you be forced to take the £80k money out of the company and to pay PAYE on it?

    i.e. Do they only look at the overall £100k "income" that you as an individual earns? Or would they be inclined to apply PAYE only to any dividends that your Ltd paid out?

Working...
X