Get 3 estate agents to come and have a look at the house and value it at £200k because it needs extensive modernisation.
Buy it at £200k and stick two fingers up at HMRC.
The silly thing is that if the doom sayers are right the house will only be worth £200k in 2 years anyway
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Stam duty on a property bought under market value"
Collapse
-
Simple answer:
Divorce your Mrs
She buys the house
Remarry your Mrs
She gifts the house to you *
*or may run away with the milkman and £200k profit
Leave a comment:
-
If you are connected, then the solictor has to declare it. You then have to declare the value of the asset.
If you are not, then it's not a problem.
If you didn't pay tax on the perceived value of it, then every parent close to death would "sell" their assets to a relative for £1 and pay no tax on them at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Your solicitor will have to answer this question when completing the SDLT 1 form
SDLT1 Q57. Purchaser and vendor connected.You must answer this question.
Answer ‘Yes’ if any purchaser is connected with any vendor; if not then answer ‘No’. For a fullaccount of connected persons see section 839 Income & Corporation Taxes Act 1988.
Legally he will have to answer "yes" which may lead to HMRC checking out the market value of your purchase.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostThere are people who sell the house for £1 and the carpets and curtains at £599,000
I think the tax collectors get a bit upset by this and come round and stab you mind.
From what I have read so far looks like this 400 is divided 200/200 - half now half later.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostThere are people who sell the house for £1 and the carpets and curtains at £599,000
I think the tax collectors get a bit upset by this and come round and stab you mind.
There is one department which solely looks at property sales close to SDLT thresholds.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostThank you, ASB, that document goes some way to explaining where open market value is declared, rather than the transaction value. However, I don't think any of the situations in "Requirement to notify the market value of a property at question 10" really apply to my situation, so it's still unclear what will be due.
I will budget for the higher amount and if the deal goes forward and only the lower amount ends up being due then I will consider it a bonus.
If does also say:
"Note: a gift of an interest in land does not itself constitute a chargeable transaction for stamp duty land tax."
It might just be possible for them to gift you half, you acquire the other half at market value and the consideration of that be the amount subjected to SDLT. There is obviously some sort of issue because the two transactions are part of one transaction but you never know your luck.
Leave a comment:
-
There are people who sell the house for £1 and the carpets and curtains at £599,000
I think the tax collectors get a bit upset by this and come round and stab you mind.
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you, ASB, that document goes some way to explaining where open market value is declared, rather than the transaction value. However, I don't think any of the situations in "Requirement to notify the market value of a property at question 10" really apply to my situation, so it's still unclear what will be due.
I will budget for the higher amount and if the deal goes forward and only the lower amount ends up being due then I will consider it a bonus.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostQuite! So you would expect to pay £2,200 in duty, correct? Why is it different for me? Because I'm a connected person? Please someone show me a document which lays out rules regarding connected persons and stamp duty.
If they would sell it to one of a limited set then I would expect to pay stamp duty on 400k - or whatever an independent valuation was. It's not different because you are connected. It is because there is an element of gift.
Here are some details of the calculation, I don't think it says in black and white what you are looking for, but it is quite clear that there is a requirement to notify the open market value, the consideration and that tax is playable on the open market price.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/sdlt6/fill-forms/calculation.htm
Leave a comment:
-
Whoa! Apologies if I came across condescending and dismissive, that’s not the what I was trying to do… some of me was playing devil’s advocate and trying to justify views with comparisons (i.e. the VAT). I can hack a debate, but part of debating is disagreeing with others, right?
If the correct and legal amount that is due is the higher amount then I am happy to pay my tax, but if I’m over paying because I haven’t planned properly or investigated all options then I will be kicking myself. There is a very clear distinction between someone who fraudulently falsifies information in order to avoid tax and someone who plans ahead and uses knowledge of the system to reduce their liability. I was a bit upset I was being labelled as the former.
Originally posted by ASBIf no then the pen market value of the house is 220k not 400k.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostI disagree. Why should my good fortune be regarded as fraud?! If you went to buy an item in the shop priced at £100 but when you went to the till, it was reduced to £50, would you say "hold on, I should pay the VAT on the £100, otherwise it is fraud!"
There is also another issue. That is the value of your relatives estate. In the event that they die in the next 7 years the estate is likely to be assessed for IHT on the basis of the asset being disposed of at the "correct" price. [Essentially the difference between the 200k and 400k will be treated as a gift].
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostWhy is it fraud? We're not buying at a lower price just in order to avoid tax, we're doing it to take advantage of a generous offer. If the tax form says 'what was the value of the transaction?' and I put £200k, where is the fraud in that?!.
You'd still have to pay the tax if the property were gifted to you for nothing. The rational behind this is entirely because you are connected to the seller. If this offer of buying it at that price is genuinely available to an unconnected person, then the tax is based upon actual price, but if there is an element of gift in the price then the tax is based upon market value.
And I'll think you'll find it was the Tories who introduced this rule.
tim
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostWhy is it fraud? We're not buying at a lower price just in order to avoid tax, we're doing it to take advantage of a generous offer. If the tax form says 'what was the value of the transaction?' and I put £200k, where is the fraud in that?!
I would appreciate a link to a HMRC doc if you know this is true. Only thing I can find about connected persons under SDLT is about when relatives buy a property together, and the total tax due is on the combined value - i.e. if I and my brother buy a £300k property, we don't pay £150k @ 1% each, we pay £150k x 3% each even though 150 is under the 3% band, because 300 is over.
If it is clearly 200k, why start a thread on this?
Sometimes you can get away with dividing property into house and fixtures/fittings. But HMRC might look more closely at such deals.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostI disagree. Why should my good fortune be regarded as fraud?! If you went to buy an item in the shop priced at £100 but when you went to the till, it was reduced to £50, would you say "hold on, I should pay the VAT on the £100, otherwise it is fraud!"
If you can't hack the debate, stay out of it. Nobody's saying your position is wrong, but the actual answer is as I stated - it's nothing to do with monies paid, its about perceived worth.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: