• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sole trader vs Limited from a tax perspective"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    I think you might want to wait until after the budget,. Martha is threatening to wipe out a lot of the tax advantages of current pension planning...

    Given that risk and the market in general, I should stick with an umbrella for a while and see how things develop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Untouchable1
    replied
    I ran the numbers again with higher expenses and pension contributions. Increasing expenses doesn't make a difference from a tax liability. With no pension contributions, a sole trader is definitely more tax-efficient. (and less costs of insurance, accountants, hassle etc)

    However, as soon as you start paying anything towards a pension, it is more tax-efficient to have a limited company.

    I'm not convinced by a lot of these articles and always try to run the numbers myself - there's a lot of money to be made by the service industry supporting contractors!

    As you say though, it's standard practice and expected by clients to operate from a limited company.

    After 5 years permie, it back to contractor land for me and the gov. have obviously changed the game. It's clear my previous contracting tour of duty was done during the golden years!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    For a start most agencies and clients won't take on sole traders. They are on the hook if you don't pay taxes I believe so will shy away from it and with outside gigs so thin on the ground you don't want to be giving them any reason to pick the next person over you.

    I don't see anything about pensions in those calcs and for a year those expenses look a tad low (but I am used to staying away/commuting).

    Ring a friendly accountant with the promise of business if you can have 15 mins with them to go over the numbers for you.

    Every article I can see still says LTD is more efficient over 20k a year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Untouchable1
    started a topic Sole trader vs Limited from a tax perspective

    Sole trader vs Limited from a tax perspective

    Returning contractor here.

    Setting up as a limited company always was more tax-efficient, but is that still true?

    When I use the calculator it tells me that I pay less tax as a sole trader.

    What's going on here?

    What are the benefits of setting up as a limited from a financial perspective?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 09.42.01.png
Views:	148
Size:	202.5 KB
ID:	4297308

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 09.41.38.png
Views:	204
Size:	89.0 KB
ID:	4297307

Working...
X