• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "S660 : How many people here are still allowing a partner to take dividends?"

Collapse

  • VinnyB
    replied
    Originally posted by Back In Business
    The Co Sec thing isn't really that important (for this discussion), it comes down to shareholders. If you have 100% of the shares you cannot pay Divs to anyone else.

    I would get an accountant . . . urgently.
    Share is 50/50 between me and the wife. I have an accountant. Not happy with them, not just of the lack of advise/guidance I get.

    I've learnt more since being on this forum than from my dealings with them.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    My partner - we arnt married - invested in the co. when it was started up and bought shares in the co at the time. She owns 1/3, I own 2/3 and divi's are paid accordingly.

    She is also Co. Secretary but as has been said before this has no bearing on dividend payments.

    Leave a comment:


  • Back In Business
    replied
    The Co Sec thing isn't really that important (for this discussion), it comes down to shareholders. If you have 100% of the shares you cannot pay Divs to anyone else.

    I would get an accountant . . . urgently.

    Leave a comment:


  • VinnyB
    replied
    Originally posted by Sockpuppet
    Depends what her "role" is.

    If she is the Co Secretary then you have to make the position redundant not the person.
    She's not the CO sec, she just does the 'admin'. (and spends money)

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    You don't need different right or different share classes. Irrespective of share allocations you can pay differing amounts. Just ensure you get a waiver from the shareholders being "short changed".

    This is probably similar to standing in front of your locar IR office with a placard saying "come and get me" but it is legal.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Assume what Martin B means by (assuming equal status shares). You can issue different classes of shares that allow you to vary the payments, might be easier than having to change shareholdings to vary amounts paid.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mickmanus
    replied
    Differant share rights

    Originally posted by martinb
    You can only pay dividends in proportion to the shareholding (assuming equal status shares),. You can't choose to pay one shareholder divis, but not the other(s).
    If you have differant share rights you can.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Haven't paid the wife anything for years. Not much point since she mostly starting earning over the higher tax rate limit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Originally posted by VinnyB
    BTW she is an employee and shareholder. Can I make her redundant and pay her a tax free severance?
    Depends what her "role" is.

    If she is the Co Secretary then you have to make the position redundant not the person.

    Leave a comment:


  • VinnyB
    replied
    Originally posted by martinb
    You can only pay dividends in proportion to the shareholding (assuming equal status shares),. You can't choose to pay one shareholder divis, but not the other(s).
    Then I'm screwed.... seriously, I'll have to wait the outcome from Arctic and be prepared for the worse.

    BTW she is an employee and shareholder. Can I make her redundant and pay her a tax free severance?

    Leave a comment:


  • martinb
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian
    How do you manage to do this? Do you still pay dividends to yourself?
    You can only pay dividends in proportion to the shareholding (assuming equal status shares),. You can't choose to pay one shareholder divis, but not the other(s).

    Leave a comment:


  • martinb
    replied
    Originally posted by VinnyB
    My wife is employed by my company and receives dividends. I have limited the amount that goes out to soften the blow of any future claim by the HMRC while the case is pending. What I do next FY will probably be something like - hold off any divi payments until after June, then either she gets a big fat cheque or she doesn't. Not sure if this is the right thing to do, but who knows.
    Dividends are paid to shareholders, not employees. You don't have to be an employee to be a shareholder and you don't have to be a shareholder to be an employee. Of course, she maybe an employee AND a shareholder - but there is massive difference between the two. If she is an employee but not a shareholder and you've been paying her divis, you've got some problems to sort out.
    Last edited by martinb; 16 February 2007, 14:43.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by VinnyB
    My wife is employed by my company and receives dividends. I have limited the amount that goes out to soften the blow of any future claim by the HMRC while the case is pending. What I do next FY will probably be something like - hold off any divi payments until after June, then either she gets a big fat cheque or she doesn't. Not sure if this is the right thing to do, but who knows.
    How do you manage to do this? Do you still pay dividends to yourself?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lockhouse
    replied
    I am waiting for the result before deciding whether to fund a business for my wife via my Ltd.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Originally posted by Nixon Williams
    Arctic did win but the Revenue have noe taken it to the House of Lords, expected in June, so we are waiting for the final judgement!

    Alan
    Most of the house of lords probably do the same so they are likely to rule in favour for us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X