• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IR35 BBC Radio 4 - MoneyBox"

Collapse

  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    SFA
    As I suspected

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    SFA

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Having watched the Finance Bill Sub-Committee session shared above, I thought it was very interesting with some excellent points made.

    My question is, what can the committee do / influence?

    Leave a comment:


  • PTP
    replied
    Start preparing your notes for a radio phone in on the reforms. LBC Wed 6pm

    https://twitter.com/ClaerB/status/1232003900661780480

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    What scares me, is if any sane person listens to this and the previous HoL committee it’s a no brainier. What we don’t see is what HMRC say to ten HoL when presenting “the other view”

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    It would get IPSE some new members...

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    Well apparently it polled well with members. It was the evil CC who put the kybosh on it
    Yep - it polled will with people that didn't look into the idea.

    Anyone who spent 5 minutes looking at it could see the flaws (for it has many) and what the end result of those flaws would be (something that would make you no better off than inside IR35)..
    Last edited by eek; 24 February 2020, 16:44.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    IPSE are discussion Freelancer Limited Companies once again - let me think of the numbers of ways I can call that a blooming stupid idea...
    Well apparently it polled well with members. It was the evil CC who put the kybosh on it

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Scruff View Post
    House of Lords from 15:15 today

    parliament.tv
    https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/5633642f-f49...
    Again, try this link

    https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Inde...3-c1b2b480b914

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Scruff View Post
    House of Lords from 15:15 today

    parliament.tv
    https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/5633642f-f49...
    IPSE are discussion Freelancer Limited Companies once again - let me think of the numbers of ways I can call that a blooming stupid idea...

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    House of Lords from 15:15 today

    parliament.tv
    https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/5633642f-f49...

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by dommy View Post
    Completely agree with you. I could perhaps entertain working paying more tax (even though it rankles re: Employee rights) but I will no longer be able to afford to stay in hotels. So, the movable/flexible work-force will cease. It is not a matter of 'biting the bullet' it just an economic fact I woud not be able to afford to stay over during the week. I am curious to know what this 2015 ruling was? It maybe I did not know it was any different!
    Back in 2015 there was a move to remove expenses from limited company contractors - I defeated that* *using a survey conducted here and elsewhere) but HMRC kept the changes in part so expenses are only allowed if the contract is outside IR35 or you are working via an umbrella company and not subject to Supervision, Direction and Control..

    * although IPSE argue it was them, I just go with what the senior HMRC policy civil servants I met tell me. I will leave you to look at IPSE's subsequent successes in fighting the 2017 public sector and 2020 private sector changes to judge how accurate IPSE's claims were.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    You sure about that (the PSC bit, he is very pro IR35) I always thought he made it clear he was "old school" self employed
    It might have been an assumption. I recall it but cannot reference it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    That’s because the presenter is pro IR35 even though he works through his own PSC.
    You sure about that (the PSC bit, he is very pro IR35) I always thought he made it clear he was "old school" self employed

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    That’s because the presenter is pro IR35 even though he works through his own PSC.
    He was surprisingly less vehement about his views this time around. He trotted out the party line, as expected.

    Dave Chaplin did his best but it's hard in a 5 minute vox pop to get the issue across clearly.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X