• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "QDOS TLC35 insurance not an allowable expense for corporation tax?"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    This appears to be a concession to his other point, that you are a bell-end.
    Well I've go no defense there have I?

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperLooper View Post
    Mods, please save us from these bickering bell-ends.
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I find this very offensive and upsetting. I've never been accused of bickering and demand you withdraw your unfounded accusation.
    This appears to be a concession to his other point, that you are a bell-end.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Well, to be honest I've been banned for it more times than I care to remember but didn't think that was relevant when I'm offended and wanted express my outrage.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    You have now
    Well, to be honest I've been banned for it more times than I care to remember but didn't think that was relevant when I'm offended and wanted express my outrage.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    QDOS just came back to me and quoted the exact same link, without advising directly whether it's an allowable expense or not as they are not accountants.
    No, but they have a very close association with one. QDOS Accounting offer a range of services, including one that uses YourCo...

    Then again go far enough up the tree and you end up with
    a group called Tokio Marine.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I find this very offensive and upsetting. I've never been accused of bickering and demand you withdraw your unfounded accusation.
    You have now

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperLooper View Post
    Mods, please save us from these bickering bell-ends.
    I find this very offensive and upsetting. I've never been accused of bickering and demand you withdraw your unfounded accusation.

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperLooper
    replied
    Mods, please save us from these bickering bell-ends.

    Leave a comment:


  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I'm not the only one and wasn't your ban for doing exactly this so don't let any of that get in the way of saying its only me. You just replied to someone calling you out for being a tedious chunt ffs.

    And as many cases the only argument is in your head. Like this one. I posted the link explaining it yet you still decided to ruin another thread with your tedious bollocks thinking there was a topic to agree or disagree with. There isn't. It's there in black and white. Only you would bring in HMRC and tribunals... Proving what? Nothing.

    It's very frustrating.
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    good!

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I'm not the only one and wasn't your ban for doing exactly this so don't let any of that get in the way of saying its only me. You just replied to someone calling you out for being a tedious chunt ffs.

    And as many cases the only argument is in your head. Like this one. I posted the link explaining it yet you still decided to ruin another thread with your tedious bollocks thinking there was a topic to agree or disagree with. There isn't. It's there in black and white. Only you would bring in HMRC and tribunals... Proving what? Nothing.

    It's very frustrating
    .
    good!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    QDOS just came back to me and quoted the exact same link, without advising directly whether it's an allowable expense or not as they are not accountants.
    QDOS told you to ask your accountant? I like their style.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    Accountant has come back with this as to why it is not an allowable expense:
    BIM46452 - Business Income Manual - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK

    I have asked QDOS to comment as well
    QDOS just came back to me and quoted the exact same link, without advising directly whether it's an allowable expense or not as they are not accountants.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
    absolutely!

    but then again, NLUK started it when I returned to posting on CUK, by being aggressive and abusive when he disagreed with me, and when I posted what I really believe. Karma comes to mind.
    I'm not the only one and wasn't your ban for doing exactly this so don't let any of that get in the way of saying its only me. You just replied to someone calling you out for being a tedious chunt ffs.

    And as many cases the only argument is in your head. Like this one. I posted the link explaining it yet you still decided to ruin another thread with your tedious bollocks thinking there was a topic to agree or disagree with. There isn't. It's there in black and white. Only you would bring in HMRC and tribunals... Proving what? Nothing.

    It's very frustrating.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Honestly, you don't have to work at it, it obviously comes naturally to you.
    absolutely!

    but then again, NLUK started it when I returned to posting on CUK, by being aggressive and abusive when he disagreed with me, and when I posted what I really believe. Karma comes to mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • dx4100
    replied
    I asked my accountant many years ago if I could put this sort of insurance through the books and it was a clear no - was one of the major contractor accountancy firms we all use. Never tried since and always paid for it myself.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X