• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Budget Budget

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Budget Budget"

Collapse

  • MrC
    replied
    Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
    So yes, these are the critical points and no one yet knows what the answer will be. But you can guarantee one thing: HMRC will make all attempts to get their desperate, illogical hands on CGT for the entire distribution. So they will lobby HMT to remove ER for liquidations regardless of what stage they are in, and for the entire distribution.
    Just to be clear you are suggesting that in Heathmounts scenerio above, HMRC would , given their way, not allow ER against the March 20 distribtion even if it were before the law changed?

    If you are then there's a case for trying to get a 100% distribution in this tax year and this is likely to be a much bigger win for most (getting ER on 100%) rather that getting no ER whatsoever but having 2 years CGT.

    Is anyone else thinking its a safer bet to get 100% this tax year with the ER and write off the £1200?

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by Heathmount View Post
    OK, so following scenario:

    MVL process started and 75% distributed in March 2020
    Budget announcement that entrepreneurs relief to be cancelled from April 6th but still allowed for MVL's in progress.
    Remaining 25% distributed in July 2020

    Are we saying that 75% is applicable for ER and 25% is not?

    Obviously I'll be finding everything out next week from MVL but wondered what people's opinons were on here.

    heathmount

    So yes, these are the critical points and no one yet knows what the answer will be. But you can guarantee one thing: HMRC will make all attempts to get their desperate, illogical hands on CGT for the entire distribution. So they will lobby HMT to remove ER for liquidations regardless of what stage they are in, and for the entire distribution.

    We just have to hope that government sees fit to make a logical law, perhaps not even remove ER.

    Leave a comment:


  • ahspooner
    replied
    I guess it depends on when/if ER is disposed. If it's April 6th then I'm assuming initial distribution will have ER, the second just having capital gains tax applied.

    Originally posted by Heathmount View Post
    OK, so following scenario:

    MVL process started and 75% distributed in March 2020
    Budget announcement that entrepreneurs relief to be cancelled from April 6th but still allowed for MVL's in progress.
    Remaining 25% distributed in July 2020

    Are we saying that 75% is applicable for ER and 25% is not?

    Obviously I'll be finding everything out next week from MVL but wondered what people's opinons were on here.

    heathmount

    Leave a comment:


  • Heathmount
    replied
    OK, so following scenario:

    MVL process started and 75% distributed in March 2020
    Budget announcement that entrepreneurs relief to be cancelled from April 6th but still allowed for MVL's in progress.
    Remaining 25% distributed in July 2020

    Are we saying that 75% is applicable for ER and 25% is not?

    Obviously I'll be finding everything out next week from MVL but wondered what people's opinons were on here.

    heathmount

    Leave a comment:


  • MrButton
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Nah, you're taxed according to when you receive the distribution, so you could indeed split it across two tax years and get relief in each (assuming whomever does your MVL is willing to factor it like that).
    Based on posts I’ve seen from Maslin (I think) this is how I understand it too.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Heathmount View Post
    Hi. I've just spoken to MVL today, just waiting for my last invoice to come in before officially kicking things off. From the quote above you seem to think that you could get 2 lots of 12k tax free capital gains, I assume based on getting 75% of the distribution within a few weeks (this tax year) and then the other 25% within 4-6 months (next tax year)? Is this right? From what I heard today there's a single point in time at which you are deemed to have liquidated the company and so the entire distribution would fall within a single tax year regardless of when you actually receive the money?

    Heathmout
    Nah, you're taxed according to when you receive the distribution, so you could indeed split it across two tax years and get relief in each (assuming whomever does your MVL is willing to factor it like that).

    Leave a comment:


  • Heathmount
    replied
    Originally posted by MrButton View Post
    From what I understand it’s still worth trying to get in with the initial distribution within the current tax year. So you get this years 12k tax free allowance. And next years.
    Hi. I've just spoken to MVL today, just waiting for my last invoice to come in before officially kicking things off. From the quote above you seem to think that you could get 2 lots of 12k tax free capital gains, I assume based on getting 75% of the distribution within a few weeks (this tax year) and then the other 25% within 4-6 months (next tax year)? Is this right? From what I heard today there's a single point in time at which you are deemed to have liquidated the company and so the entire distribution would fall within a single tax year regardless of when you actually receive the money?

    Heathmout

    Leave a comment:


  • ahspooner
    replied
    That's my plan. Accountancy has started proceedings, then im going to take a call when they're done whether to pass it to the liquidator. If the accountants promises of turnaround time aren't met, then the process is reversable at that point. I just wanted to build in plenty of time for the liquidator. I'd rather reverse the process than 1st distribution going into the next tax year without knowing the state of the budget.

    I'm probably overly worrying, but would rather remain in control (relatively at least)

    Originally posted by MrButton View Post
    From what I understand it’s still worth trying to get in with the initial distribution within the current tax year. So you get this years 12k tax free allowance. And next years.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrButton
    replied
    Originally posted by ahspooner View Post
    This is one of the reasons i've been indecisive about MVL.

    I was going to start the process on Monday, but wanted assurances that the initial distribution would be pre 20/21 tax year (April 6th), therefore a known quantity. The last situation I wanted to be in, was to start the process, hit a blocker then a change come into the budget which I couldnt then course correct.

    I think it's unlikely they'll change it with effect from Aprl 6th, as people could have been going through the MVL process for months before the new tax year, and it wouldn't be fair. But then again, when has life been fair.
    From what I understand it’s still worth trying to get in with the initial distribution within the current tax year. So you get this years 12k tax free allowance. And next years.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrC
    replied
    Originally posted by ahspooner View Post
    This is one of the reasons i've been indecisive about MVL.

    I was going to start the process on Monday, but wanted assurances that the initial distribution would be pre 20/21 tax year (April 6th), therefore a known quantity. The last situation I wanted to be in, was to start the process, hit a blocker then a change come into the budget which I couldnt then course correct.

    I think it's unlikely they'll change it with effect from Aprl 6th, as people could have been going through the MVL process for months before the new tax year, and it wouldn't be fair. But then again, when has life been fair.
    I get your point, it's very much a one way street.

    How did you fare in getting any assurances?

    You'd like to think that any change would be reasonably phased in eg any companies currently in liquidation would be exempt from changes.

    Worst case you hit 20% rather than 10% - its still less costly than HR divis though obviously a lot more tax than a pension or slow extraction.

    And you are not wrong - life isn't fair - felt like telling one of the permies at clientco that this week when they were whinging about contractor pay!
    Last edited by MrC; 16 January 2020, 17:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • ahspooner
    replied
    This is one of the reasons i've been indecisive about MVL.

    I was going to start the process on Monday, but wanted assurances that the initial distribution would be pre 20/21 tax year (April 6th), therefore a known quantity. The last situation I wanted to be in, was to start the process, hit a blocker then a change come into the budget which I couldnt then course correct.

    I think it's unlikely they'll change it with effect from Aprl 6th, as people could have been going through the MVL process for months before the new tax year, and it wouldn't be fair. But then again, when has life been fair.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by MrC View Post
    Regards the review. What makes you think that it will be annouced prior to carrying it out?
    It's all guesswork, I suppose, but the review was a manifesto commitment, so I would expect a full announcement and period of review, followed by conclusions. I don't think they'll delay between conclusions and implementation though; they will share the results on a budget day, together with the legislative changes to apply from that day, at least if history is any guide.

    Technically, they can do anything they want, but I'm pretty confident they won't do anything in the March 11 budget w/r to legislative change. It's worth what you paid for it though

    Leave a comment:


  • MrC
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Budget is March 11. That is a spring budget. You could also view it as a delayed-autumn-budget, since Autumn Budget 2019 didn't happen. But they aren't going to have two budgets this spring. Autumn Budget 2020 will presumably happen. They are still on the new (cf. Hammond) autumn budget timetable for the main budgets, AFAIK.

    ER will likely be flagged w/ a review on March 11 and then implemented in Autumn Budget 2020, around November 2020, and the measures will probably apply from that date, not April 2021.

    Thanks for clarifying. Makes a bit more sense now.

    Regards the review. What makes you think that it will be annouced prior to carrying it out?

    Could the review have been going on quietly in the background since the Tories got re-elected?

    Having seen gov and HMRC being pretty brutal with changes to Landlords it doesnt seem impossible to me that they could bring a change in come March 11 with immeadiate effect. Would you really want to give business 6 months + notice and loose all that lovely CG tax if you were the exchequer?

    Of course its all somewhat dependant on whether they actually want to tinker /scrap ER or if that was just supposed to be be a vote winner in their manifesto (while not a populist move it might allow them to claim they'd budgeted for the give aways)

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Budget is March 11. That is a spring budget. You could also view it as a delayed-autumn-budget, since Autumn Budget 2019 didn't happen. But they aren't going to have two budgets this spring. Autumn Budget 2020 will presumably happen. They are still on the new (cf. Hammond) autumn budget timetable for the main budgets, AFAIK.

    ER will likely be flagged w/ a review on March 11 and then implemented in Autumn Budget 2020, around November 2020, and the measures will probably apply from that date, not April 2021.
    I am thinking the same thing.

    I have been investigating into when the ER changes could actually apply, and the details I'm getting from accountants is that the distributions (from liquidation) must be made before the ER changes are effected.

    The actual submission for ER relief will then be made on your personal SATR, in Jan 2022.

    For example, if you begin the liquidation in August 2020 and funds are distributed in October, before ER is scrapped in November - then you can still make a claim for ER in January 2022 on your SATR.

    It gets (more) complicated if a partial distribution is made before the ER changes come in. But then again, it's not like HMRC/HMT to ever make things straightforward.

    This is of course all conjecture so far.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    New taxes incoming - higher divintax, higher CGT, destroyed ER

    Still beats the alertnative

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X