Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Expensive Coffee Machine as Expense
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Expensive Coffee Machine as Expense"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI would have thought it would have been better through an offshore loan that then get's written off costing giving them full tax relief and zero cost. Something like the Cayman Isles branch of Brighthouse?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostIt is more efficient to get your SIPP to purchase it via a holding company in the Dutch Antilles and then lease it to your company.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostYou'd also have to apportion any VAT claim too.
The above would probably make the whole operation above board so long as HMIT accepts the business/private use split as realistic but you then have to ask yourself...what's the point?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by craigy1874 View PostAdd as company asset, claim AIA on cost.
Flip side is benefit in kind at 20% of cost each year. Pay NIC on the 20% value. Then split benefit between business/private use and pay tax on the private use part.
No issues with this whatsoever.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by craigy1874 View PostAdd as company asset, claim AIA on cost.
Flip side is benefit in kind at 20% of cost each year. Pay NIC on the 20% value. Then split benefit between business/private use and pay tax on the private use part.
No issues with this whatsoever.
The above would probably make the whole operation above board so long as HMIT accepts the business/private use split as realistic but you then have to ask yourself...what's the point?
Leave a comment:
-
Add as company asset, claim AIA on cost.
Flip side is benefit in kind at 20% of cost each year. Pay NIC on the 20% value. Then split benefit between business/private use and pay tax on the private use part.
No issues with this whatsoever.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MonkeysUncle View PostThis!
I told my accountant I need a line of coke every morning otherwise I cant function as a PM. He agreed its wholly and exclusively for the business and so I can now expense any deals back to my ltd. Go for it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by emanuelricardo View PostAs an IT contractor and software developer I need coffee to carry out my work. I cannot focus without caffeine and it is an essential thing for me to carry out the nature of my cognitive work.
I told my accountant I need a line of coke every morning otherwise I cant function as a PM. He agreed its wholly and exclusively for the business and so I can now expense any deals back to my ltd. Go for it.
Leave a comment:
-
Please do. Makes us honest folk look better in front of the taxman
Leave a comment:
-
Mods can this be moved to general? I’m sure the parody threads would be epic!
Leave a comment:
-
The wholly and exclusively rule isn’t the only thing to consider here.
By definition a company can buy something as a perk for its employees and that makes it wholly and exclusively for business purposes and allowable for a corporation tax deduction. It doesn’t have to be something they need to do their job.
The issue is whether or not it would be treated as a BIK which would result in a personal tax charge on OP.
IMO a small coffee machine kept in the home office and supply of coffee would not attract any attention at an inspection any more than buying a desk/chair/filing cabinet. A large expensive coffee machine kept in the kitchen would.
But nobody can say for certain. I think OP needs to think about this. I would take their accountants advice on this one.Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 23 March 2019, 21:22.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by emanuelricardo View PostI am confident that I should be able to expense this coffee machine and book it as a business asset
but my accountant told me that I can't
I am pretty sure he is wrong or at least I really don't see why I shouldn't. Am I missing something, because I couldn't find any guidance by HMRC which would explain why this is not acceptable?
BIM37007 - Business Income Manual - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK
that people will read and understand terms such as
an expense has been incurred for a dual purpose. Such expenditure should be disallowed
You don't need a coffee machine to do your job so it's not allowable.
And even if it was Cojaks comment covers it.
Spending £1600 is just taking the piss.
As an IT contractor and software developer I need coffee to carry out my work.Last edited by northernladuk; 23 March 2019, 17:25.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: