And with Sue at IPAYE post I will close this thread.
Boo if you continue posting your 'advice' I will begin infracting you. This will lead to a permaban.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Is my contract compliant with the 183-day rule?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Boo View PostSE and stek are both saying that and they are both wrong. Your employer is YourCo whiche is a UK registered Ltd Co. having no permanentvestablishment in Belgium. Unless your parent's house is a permanentcestablishment of YourCo.
Boo
Edmund: Look, there's no need to panic. Someone in the crew will
know how to steer this thing.
Rum: The crew, milord?
Edmund: Yes, the crew.
Rum: What crew?
Edmund: I was under the impression that it was common maritime practice
for a ship to have a crew.
Rum: Opinion is divided on the subject.
Edmund: Oh, really? [starting to get the picture]
Rum: Yahs. All the other captains say it is; I say it isn't.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Boo View PostThis is not true, in order for there to be a permanent establishment in the destination state there must firstly be an establisment (constituting, at a mimimum, premises from which a business can be run) and secondly it must be permanent.
If the OP stays in a b&b then there are no business premises for his company and hence no establishment, and if s/he stays for less than 183 days then it is not permanent. Therefore not liable for Belgian taxes. QED.
ISTM the complicating factors are that the OP will stay at his/her parents' house (hence possibly an establishment) and also may be working for more than the initial year (probably still not permanent but a bit of a red rag to the BTA). Under these circumstances we are all left guessing as to the legal outcome if the situation arose but I personally would stay in a b&b instead.
Boo2
Would you expect to work in say Japan and pay no local tax? No, same for EU, there is no special treatment.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rgeurts View PostHi Sue,
Thanks for the advice so far.
Question:
Article 15 says: "The remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment which the employer has in the other state."
Are you saying that the UK based recruitment agency is a permanent establishment (PE) of the Belgian based end client?
Boo
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIf you are the only director when you move location e.g. out if the UK, so does the management of your company.
If the OP stays in a b&b then there are no business premises for his company and hence no establishment, and if s/he stays for less than 183 days then it is not permanent. Therefore not liable for Belgian taxes. QED.
ISTM the complicating factors are that the OP will stay at his/her parents' house (hence possibly an establishment) and also may be working for more than the initial year (probably still not permanent but a bit of a red rag to the BTA). Under these circumstances we are all left guessing as to the legal outcome if the situation arose but I personally would stay in a b&b instead.
Boo2
Leave a comment:
-
Rewording the DTA with places, to make more sense........
(1) Subject to the provisions of Articles 16, 18 and 19 of this Convention, salaries, wages
and other similar remuneration derived by a resident of a Contracting State (UK) in respect of
an employment shall be taxable only in that State (UK) unless the employment is exercised in
the other Contracting State (Belgium). If the employment is so exercised, such remuneration as is
derived therefrom may be taxed in that other State (Belgium).
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of this Article, remuneration derived
by a resident of a Contracting State (UK) in respect of an employment exercised in the other
Contracting State (Belgium) shall be taxable only in the first-mentioned State (UK) if:
(a) the recipient is present in the other State (Belgium) for a period or periods not exceeding in
the aggregate 183 days within any period of 12 months; and
(b) the remuneration is paid by, or on behalf of, an employer who is not a resident of
the other State (Belgium); and
(c) the remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment or a fixed base which
the employer has in the other State (Belgium).
Leave a comment:
-
No, the Belgian client is the Belgian based PE.
The economic employer is the person or entity which bears the cost of your employment, and benefits from your services. In this case that is not the UK recruitment agency. They are not paying for you to be in their offices in the UK, providing your services to them. The UK agency is an intermediary for a client. That client is paying them to pay you.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Sue,
Thanks for the advice so far.
Question:
Article 15 says: "The remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment which the employer has in the other state."
Are you saying that the UK based recruitment agency is a permanent establishment (PE) of the Belgian based end client?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rgeurts View PostHi Sue,
Thanks for your reply.
The entity ultimately paying for my services is a UK based recruitment agency with no establishment in Belgium.
Regards
Rim
I doubt the UK recruitment agency is the economic employer, they will be billing your time onto someone else. If that someone else has a PE in Belgium, or is not based in the UK, then its caught.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rgeurts View PostThe entity ultimately paying for my services is a UK based recruitment agency with no establishment in Belgium.
Secondly the client has a permanent establishment in Belgium and they pay the agency who pay the company, which your wife is the director.
So while the chain of the companies involved management is:
Belgium -> UK -> UK the company who is your "economic employer" under Belgium tax law is permanently based in Belgium.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi CyclingProgrammer,
Thats correct, my wife is currently the only director.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Sue,
Thanks for your reply.
If the entity ultimately paying for your services has a permanent establishment (PE) in Belgium, then part c) of Article 15 (extract below) is failed and so the 183 day rule does not apply.Last edited by rgeurts; 28 September 2016, 13:06.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIs your wife also director* or are you the only director of the company?
If you are the only director when you move location e.g. out if the UK, so does the management of your company.
*It can be someone else e.g. a parent as long as they are UK based.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rgeurts View PostThanks for the link Dave.
In addition to the details provided above, I own a house in the UK and my wife and 2 kids will remain based in the UK
According to my calculations I would spend around 126 days on-site in Belgium.
Ltd will be taxed in both countries too.Last edited by stek; 28 September 2016, 10:25.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: