• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Charging rent to my limited company"

Collapse

  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by teapot418 View Post
    Very little to gain from doing so, as you would pay personal tax on the rental income.
    £4250 would be tax free - this is going up in the new FY

    Leave a comment:


  • Emma Power Mortgages
    replied
    Originally posted by BoredBloke View Post
    Couldn't you just set up a BTL company. Then the contracting company rents the property from the BTL company.
    You could, I couldn't tell you how or if it would be worth doing, that's not my expertise I'm afraid, worth a discussion with your accountant

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Emma Power Mortgages View Post
    There is a lot of red tape around what you are looking to do. This would not fit a standard buy to let mortgage, the property could be bought by your limited company but would still have its limits, its more a second residence by the sounds of things. I would suggest a specialist broker to discuss the situation fully. Upfront advice is generally free and can at least point you in the right direction even if you choose not to proceed with the purchase
    Couldn't you just set up a BTL company. Then the contracting company rents the property from the BTL company.

    Leave a comment:


  • Emma Power Mortgages
    replied
    Originally posted by Smokebill View Post
    Hi,

    I will be starting a contract in London and I live too far away to commute on a daily basis. I am considering buying a flat. This would not be my main residence or where the business is registered. Would I be able to rent the flat to my limited company as it will be used as business based accommodation? If I am allowed to do this, would this require a specific buy to let mortgage?

    Thanks in advance

    There is a lot of red tape around what you are looking to do. This would not fit a standard buy to let mortgage, the property could be bought by your limited company but would still have its limits, its more a second residence by the sounds of things. I would suggest a specialist broker to discuss the situation fully. Upfront advice is generally free and can at least point you in the right direction even if you choose not to proceed with the purchase

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    Originally posted by Smokebill View Post
    I have come across a company that will allow me to put the mortgage in the limited company name.
    I don't see how they can do that. Ultimately the mortgage is the mortgage, "owned" by whoever arranged it. "putting it in the company name" makes no sense to me.

    edit: i.e if the mortgage is in the company name then it is their mortgage (at whatever rates etc are available). An exisiting lender could potentially agree to transit the product of course. But it is in their gift.
    Last edited by ASB; 20 January 2016, 19:32.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Id thought about doing this. Not least because if your paying £1300 or so a month in rent that's £15k your business is handing over to another person for the privilege of using their flat. So if your company owns the flat, yes you'll ultimately pay CGT on the sale of the flat but it's got to be be better than handing 15k a year to another person. So your 15k a year pays off the mortgage and your business ends up with a very expensive asset.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by fidot View Post
    Sorry, no personal experience of this.
    However, if the company is regarded as owning the property, wouldn't any profit made if/when the property is sold be taxable as a company profit?
    Yes - with no CGT allowance to play with.

    Leave a comment:


  • fidot
    replied
    Originally posted by Smokebill View Post
    I have come across a company that will allow me to put the mortgage in the limited company name. This gets around the problem of having to charge expenses back to the company and also would mean I could continue to deduct mortgage interest and other expenses when renting the property. Interest rates are in line with residential mortgage deals.

    Anyone have any experience of this?
    Sorry, no personal experience of this.
    However, if the company is regarded as owning the property, wouldn't any profit made if/when the property is sold be taxable as a company profit?

    Leave a comment:


  • Smokebill
    replied
    Originally posted by Smokebill View Post
    Thanks ASB - this seems a sensible approach.
    I have come across a company that will allow me to put the mortgage in the limited company name. This gets around the problem of having to charge expenses back to the company and also would mean I could continue to deduct mortgage interest and other expenses when renting the property. Interest rates are in line with residential mortgage deals.

    Anyone have any experience of this?

    Leave a comment:


  • Smokebill
    replied
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    What I did (and yes it passed investigation) was:-

    - Bought house
    - Expensed equivalent to Mortgage Interest, Council Tax, Utility Bills
    - Charged £10 overnights
    - Declared £500/annum BIK for private use. Family came up a few times

    No declaration of personal SATR.

    HMIT was OK, both from company and personal perspective.

    Should he have been? Not sure, the argument I used was it was cheapest most cost effective way. But with reflection I should probably have been declaring income equivalent to Council Tax and Utility Bills. Interest was of course chargeable.

    I suspect the answer may be different if investigated now.
    Thanks ASB - this seems a sensible approach.

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
    ASB - did you buy through YourCo? Assuming you did due to BIK charge.
    No, it was bought personally with a large mortgage (reallocating where debt was). The bik was agreed with hmit in the investigation as a reasonble estimate of the value of personal use as a result of staying there odd weekend etc. Feel free to pm if you want further details.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    ASB - did you buy through YourCo? Assuming you did due to BIK charge.

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    What I did (and yes it passed investigation) was:-

    - Bought house
    - Expensed equivalent to Mortgage Interest, Council Tax, Utility Bills
    - Charged £10 overnights
    - Declared £500/annum BIK for private use. Family came up a few times

    No declaration of personal SATR.

    HMIT was OK, both from company and personal perspective.

    Should he have been? Not sure, the argument I used was it was cheapest most cost effective way. But with reflection I should probably have been declaring income equivalent to Council Tax and Utility Bills. Interest was of course chargeable.

    I suspect the answer may be different if investigated now.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Big changes to BTLs coming up with no mortgage interest and wear and tear not allowed. Needs looking at carefully to work that out.

    Bit that aside OPs question is so basic he's going to understand a lot more about contractor expenses in general before going down this route.

    Leave a comment:


  • Smokebill
    replied
    Originally posted by teapot418 View Post
    Very little to gain from doing so, as you would pay personal tax on the rental income.
    Hi - could income tax on rental income not be mitigated by claiming mortgage interest and other expenses?

    Thanks,

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X