• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "A question about claiming expenses within a limited company"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by ContrataxLtd View Post
    Correct, if he was just being remunerated by salary then IR35 would be irrelevant assuming he wouldn't have more than 5% of the share capital in his dad's company.
    Which is the can of worms I was alluding to. He needs to get it right to make sure he's using the most efficient manner. If he's outside would being paid as an employee really be the best option?

    Leave a comment:


  • ContrataxLtd
    replied
    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
    Wouldn't IR35 be irrelevant if OP is only an employee of his Father's company? Isn't OP basically using it as an umbrella?
    Correct, if he was just being remunerated by salary then IR35 would be irrelevant assuming he wouldn't have more than 5% of the share capital in his dad's company.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    You've had an IR35 check on the contract? Rolling three months might mean you might be inside which opens a new can of worms you might need to look in to.
    Wouldn't IR35 be irrelevant if OP is only an employee of his Father's company? Isn't OP basically using it as an umbrella?
    Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 3 November 2015, 11:34.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    You've had an IR35 check on the contract? Rolling three months might mean you might be inside which opens a new can of worms you might need to look in to.

    Leave a comment:


  • cerberas
    replied
    Thanks for the replies, his accountant got back to him and turns out it is dependent on the company itself, and in my dad's case it's absolutely fine - I must have worded my question poorly to him first time round as he told me as though it was obvious!

    Cheers!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kenny@MyAccountantFriend
    replied
    Yes you could per the expense policy of the company you are employed by.

    Along with usual rules such as the 24 month rule.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Tell your dad to ask his accountant.

    Leave a comment:


  • A question about claiming expenses within a limited company

    Hi there,

    I'm new to contracting, having just started a rolling 3 month contract. My dad offered me to be an employee of his limited company and we were wondering if I am eligible to claim expenses (mainly interested in travel expenses).

    Just wondering if being on another person's ltd company rather than your own affects this, any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Cheers!

Working...
X