Reply to: Notice periods

[cojak]

Notice periods

If the contract has a good MOO clause in it you can walk away if the the client stops work as outlined in the schedule and expects you to work on something different.
If the contract has no notice period inform the agent that you will no longer work/invoice on the contract and invite them to terminate.

That does the trick. So if we can do that I would expect the agent to be able to do the same.

[CloudWalker]

You Need Creative Orangutans To Butter Awkward Crumpets?

YNCOTBAC = You Never Copulate On The Boss's Arm Chair

[TheDandy]

I am sure there are contracts that aren't like that. I wouldn't sign one though.

The contract is whatever the two sides agree.

[SussexSeagull]

Your understanding is wrong then. As you have pointed out it depends entirely on the contract.

I am sure there are contracts that aren't like that. I wouldn't sign one though.

[TheDandy]

Depends on the contract but generally my understanding is the client isn't allowed to terminate the contract early.

However they don't have to offer you work at any stage of it.

Your understanding is wrong then. As you have pointed out it depends entirely on the contract.

[SussexSeagull]

Depends on the contract but generally my understanding is the client isn't allowed to terminate the contract early.

However they don't have to offer you work at any stage of it.

[GillsMan]

Which are in no way relevant to the question posted.

Boo

Yes they are. A good IR35 contract should have a MOO clause which essentially states that the client doesn't have to offer work and the contractor doesn't have to accept offered work.

It's relevant because it essentially renders notice periods irrelevant. You could have a 4 week notice period, and the client/agency provide you with your 4 weeks notice. Oh, and they also say we don't have any work for the next 4 weeks, so no need for you to come in.

So for the OP, assuming he has a good IR35 contract (which is doubtful given his second post clearly shows he's not cut out to be a contractor), should have that clause in, which means that it's perfectly acceptable to say that he's not needed for the final week.

[Boo]

While you're at search the terms "mutuality of obligation" and "IR35".

Which are in no way relevant to the question posted.

Boo

[Zero Liability]

Some contracts also have terms written in giving the client the right to terminate the contract for poor performance, gross misconduct, or any other "reasonable" cause. In effect, the notice period doesn't really mean much from their end, as it can be overridden if they really don't want you around. Hardly a bad thing if you're trading outside IR35.

[Crossroads]

Doesn't sound unusual to me. I expect the contracts has no MOO. Why don't people understand the contracts they sign?

[Andy Hallett]

Hi,
Does anyone know whether it is legal for a company to force you to leave prior to the end of your given notice period once you have given notice. ie you give the company written notice of your intention to terminate in 4 weeks time as per your contractual obligations and then they come back and say , well actually we want you to go after 3 weeks, and by the way were not paying you for the last week.

It really will depend on how the specific contract is drafted. If the client has a shorter notice than yourself this may well be correct.

It does sound an unusual situation.

[mookle]

YNCOTBAC

You Need Creative Orangutans To Butter Awkward Crumpets?

[Batcher]

Thanks for all of the arrogant, up yourself responses. I'll remember to reply to any of your posts in such a fashion.

YNCOTBAC

[stek]

Thanks for all of the arrogant, up yourself responses. I'll remember to reply to any of your posts in such a fashion.

Stay permie, you'll struggle in running a business.

[northernladuk]

Thanks for the arrogant, up yourself response. I'll remember to reply to any of your posts in such a fashion.

Now there is a turn up for the books.