Interesting thread, glad of the outcome for the OP.
In 14 years contracting I've not met a contractor who had been investigated or going through process. Met plenty who would be f**ked up they do though.
If the OP can get those questions up prob worth making this a sticky thread.
qh
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35 - Guilty as charged! - Updated May 2016 - NOT GUILTY!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by frodo View PostSeems like a lot of effort on their part. They would be better off chasing the low(er) hanging fruit by pursuing those on long, current engagements. That's where I'd put my efforts but then this is HMRC we're talking about.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThey get hold of your old client and grill them. If they've gone then happy days. Your worst nightmare is them getting hold of someone that vaguely knew you and attempts to answer all the questions which are nowhere near the truth. 'Oh yeah that guy, we treated him like an employee I guess'
You'd hope at that point though your defence steps in and points this out and cuts them off quick so they've no choice to drop the case.
That said if you are genuinely out and enough boxes are ticked they won't pursue anyway so a bit hypothetical I think.
Leave a comment:
-
They get hold of your old client and grill them. If they've gone then happy days. Your worst nightmare is them getting hold of someone that vaguely knew you and attempts to answer all the questions which are nowhere near the truth. 'Oh yeah that guy, we treated him like an employee I guess'
You'd hope at that point though your defence steps in and points this out and cuts them off quick so they've no choice to drop the case.
That said if you are genuinely out and enough boxes are ticked they won't pursue anyway so a bit hypothetical I think.Last edited by northernladuk; 20 May 2016, 14:16.
Leave a comment:
-
Checking working practices
Out of interest, if you are a contractor that genuinely falls outside of IR35 and your contract(s) tick all the right boxes, how would HMRC then go about investigating your working practices from an engagement from say 3 years ago if the project you were working on has been delivered and all people associated with the project and therefore able to confirm your working practises have since moved on?
Leave a comment:
-
How many years were they investigating to come up with a possible £100k liability?
Leave a comment:
-
Finding other contractors to investigate
A question for the OP (munchers), apologies I couldn't find your original post on this to quote here:
You had mentioned somewhere in your thread that HMRE had/may have used the investigation into your contract at Client X to then "drill down" to find other contractors at the same client to investigate. Did this happen? (makes logical sense that they would!). Any info of how it went for the other guys?
Leave a comment:
-
When op posts questions raised would it be worth putting as a sticky along with any guidance for future reference to anyone else that finds themselves in that situation
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostSome of us aren't as old as you think!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostSome of us aren't as old as you think!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dx4100 View PostAgreed... When I read it I just thought it was an older person... Lots of people still call them HMRE.... No big deal
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by theroyale View PostMaybe you do. Not everyone does. It could be that they're using the old-fashioned name because that's the one they're more familiar with. Equating with 'troll' seems ridiculous to be honest.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: