Seems like RH only bans certain users, yet others can swear and troll and nothing happens. He is in no way impartial and has been complained about by many users. Come in admin sack him and stick to people who can judge objectively.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Realityhack should not be a moderator.
Collapse
X
-
-
**** off.Originally posted by markmm View PostSeems like RH only bans certain users, yet others can swear and troll and nothing happens. He is in no way impartial and has been complained about by many users. Come in admin sack him and stick to people who can judge objectively.
Seriously. -
Many people have pointed this out, he is not fit for the role, it's clear who his favourites are and you will see them defending him shortly, however the others that have complained are targeted.Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post**** off.
Seriously.Comment
-
From someone who's been warned before. How predictable. Happy to have the debate though. Be my guest. It would save me a lot of work.Comment
-
Ban him.Originally posted by realityhack View PostFrom someone who's been warned before. How predictable. Happy to have the debate though. Be my guest. It would save me a lot of work.Comment
-
You never seem to ban certain users even though their behaviour is worse than some others, there have been threads created complaining by other users, I am sure not many will raise their heads as they will fear they will become targets of your vengeful modding.Originally posted by realityhack View PostFrom someone who's been warned before. How predictable. Happy to have the debate though. Be my guest. It would save me a lot of work.Comment
-
Examples?Originally posted by markmm View PostYou never seem to ban certain users even though their behaviour is worse than some others...
...there have been threads created complaining by other users.Comment
-
I'm right behind you mark. now just keep still for a momentOriginally posted by markmm View PostYou never seem to ban certain users even though their behaviour is worse than some others, there have been threads created complaining by other users, I am sure not many will raise their heads as they will fear they will become targets of your vengeful modding.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Yeah just ban people who question authority, we know where that leads.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostBan him.Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment