I had some bad news today. My son failed a hearing test. Further appointment needed to find out cause. I am not happy.
-
-
-
yes pleaseOriginally posted by BrilloPad View PostSi posse, recte, si non, quocumque modo remComment
-
Following on from http://life.hereisthecity.com/sound_off/112.cntnsOriginally posted by Bear View Post
In fact this article doesn't touch on divorce! The first article showed why men should not marry. This article shows the consequences of having anything to do with children!
Two cases happened in the last few weeks. In the first a woman conceived after a one night stand. She wanted the child adopted but not with her family or the father. Her wish was granted. This is because it was in the interests of the child and because the father's right to a family life was not violated (as it does not exist). In the 1989 Children Act the first line states that the interests of the child shall be paramount. It also states that any scoial services shall involve the family as much as possible. But the family courts have interpretted the interests of the child as the interests as the mother. This case further endorses that.
In the second case a man donated sperm to a lesbian couple who then bacame liable for child support. This was because the lesbian couple had split up. The man had seen the children twice. But whether he had seen them or not is irrelevant. A man has no right to see his children in law - only an obligation to pay for them.
The 1989 Children Act contains everything necessary for proper family life - however the way it has been implemented has reversed the original intention.
I do promise to return to divorce in the next article with further reason not to marry.
The author appears in the book Fathers 4 Justice by Matt O'ConnorComment
-
-
Apologies its a bit long - hope it does not stop you posting here!Comment
-
The reason they are after him is because he didn't go through the correct channels for donation. If he had, he wouldn't have to pay.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostComment
-
He is 5. One of twins. He displays odd behaviour. a bit like me - but his more pronounced. Basically borderline aspergers(sp?). gets very focused. treuble concentrating on anything not interested in.Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
I do think the hearing contributes to his issue. thing is I want to beast him for not telling me! very counter productive - I MUST do softly softly.Comment
-
Yeah - you didn't tell me that!Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
I have targets to meet you knowSi posse, recte, si non, quocumque modo remComment
-
Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
that is very true. but it is also true that "A man has no right to see his children in law - only an obligation to pay for them."Comment
Comment