Originally posted by norrahe
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
No, but having spent way too much time watching NASA tv this morning I really ought to do some work! -
-
That won't get you anywhere young man. Now go back to your desk.Originally posted by norrahe View Post
Comment
-
young man????????Originally posted by HeliCraig View PostThat won't get you anywhere young man. Now go back to your desk.
I'm a laydee don't you know!Comment
-
Yeah, right, indeed.Originally posted by zeitghost View Postwot it actually sent was "12345,E", but I'm quite sure it'll do the whole 9 yards (or 26 chrs).
Bug meant it sent 12345,E all the time, no matter what you threw at it.
Ho hum.
Now I've got figure out why it can't see "CONNECT 9600" and "RING" any more.
Comment
-
I don't discriminate.Originally posted by norrahe View Postyoung man????????
I'm a laydee don't you know!
Comment
-
Talking to ones self again?Originally posted by zeitghost View PostYeah, right, indeed.
Bug meant it sent 12345,E all the time, no matter what you threw at it.
Ho hum.
Now I've got figure out why it can't see "CONNECT 9600" and "RING" any more.

Comment
-
I'm in the dullest thread competition with Suity.Originally posted by norrahe View PostTalking to ones self again?
In case any one is interested, you can't get 491 into a byte*.
It would have been nice if the compiler had reminded me of that.
*491 was a state in a state machine, since 49 was used & so was 50...
Comment
-
Comment
-
If it's any consolation Suity would winOriginally posted by zeitghost View PostI'm in the dullest thread competition with Suity.
In case any one is interested, you can't get 491 into a byte*.
It would have been nice if the compiler had reminded me of that.
*491 was a state in a state machine, since 49 was used & so was 50...
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Today 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Yesterday 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment