test please delete

[NickFitz]

Ah, that might explain why all the forum links at the top of the page have gone microscopic.

Yes I think this does...

10px, they should be.

[BrilloPad]

Evening, Scourer

What are you up to?

I am about to watch Diamonds are Forever on ITV4. I will be asleep in 30 minutes and I know how the film ends!

[NickFitz]

NF has a challenger for top geek round here.....

Saved me the trouble of Googling it

[NickFitz]

What are you up to?

I am about to watch Diamonds are Forever on ITV4. I will be asleep in 30 minutes and I know how the film ends!

I'm mucking about with some code; I think I've just got to the point of being sufficiently stuck to go down the pub instead, and let my subconscious mind sort out the details ready for tomorrow

I could take the quick & dirty approach and have the stuff working in no time, but I'm trying to make it perfect instead

[Alias]

NF has a challenger for top geek round here.....

doubt it, i'm nowhere near his league...

[mudskipper]

10px, they should be.

Top is firefox. This is how it used to look in Chrome

Middle is IE. Smaller, or possibly just closer together, but legible.

Bottom is Chrome. Same size as IE, but there's no padding between the text and the underlines which make them hard to read.

Noticed lots of other oddities in the last few days - presumably all related.

[NickFitz]

Top is firefox. This is how it used to look in Chrome

Middle is IE. Smaller, or possibly just closer together, but legible.

Bottom is Chrome. Same size as IE, but there's no padding between the text and the underlines which make them hard to read.

Noticed lots of other oddities in the last few days - presumably all related.

Yes, that seems like antisocial antialiasing

It'll look great on a 4K monitor, I daresay

[norrahe]

Top is firefox. This is how it used to look in Chrome

Middle is IE. Smaller, or possibly just closer together, but legible.

Bottom is Chrome. Same size as IE, but there's no padding between the text and the underlines which make them hard to read.

Noticed lots of other oddities in the last few days - presumably all related.

Any chance of it being sorted before we all go blind?

[mudskipper]

Email from Stagecoach South (since when did I subscribe to their emails??)

"We recognise our website isn't very mobile-friendly, and you may not want to speak to someone on the phone - all reasons why we think @stagecoachsouth on Twitter may be what you need."

Sounds like a pitch for you, Nick!

[norrahe]

Email from Stagecoach South (since when did I subscribe to their emails??)

"We recognise our website isn't very mobile-friendly, and you may not want to speak to someone on the phone - all reasons why we think @stagecoachsouth on Twitter may be what you need."

Sounds like a pitch for you, Nick!

That really gets on my nerves when the only time you can contact customer services is either via stalkbook or tw@tter, neither of which I'm on nor ever intend to be.