Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Help - IR35 has wrecked my brain
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks again. So you wouldn't be overly concerned about extending the current contract even with the knowledge of knowing the client is not supportive of my Outside determination?
Sure, I would be concerned that they aren't supportive (of your status at any time). But I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control. If you hadn't done the due diligence on this contract in advance or if you were proposing to stick around for a lot longer, I might given you a different answer (i.e., run now), but the damage is already done w/r to the client's view of your status.Comment
-
Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, QDOS would just be reviewing a contract they have already passed as Compliant. I hear they are planning a new contract that works before and after 6th April - not sure how they will pull that trick!!The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostHave you spoke to them about your current predicament? I'd imagine you wouldn't be anywhere near the first contractor to approach them about this.Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostNot overly concerned in the sense that the extra risk is just the extra time/tax exposure (which you've mitigated by conducting due dilligence), and you aren't proposing to hang around for much longer.
Sure, I would be concerned that they aren't supportive (of your status at any time). But I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control. If you hadn't done the due diligence on this contract in advance or if you were proposing to stick around for a lot longer, I might given you a different answer (i.e., run now), but the damage is already done w/r to the client's view of your status.Comment
-
Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, Yes it's a faceless Inbox manned by illiterate buffoons..The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, I think the formal SDA will come in the next 2 to 3 weeks along with the new proposed contract - not sure if getting this makes things worse or not? Also when you say "I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control" - you mean in the future if anything transpires like an investigation?
On the latter, yes, in the event of a future investigation, HMRC and the client (presumably) will be against you, but the evidence will support you; that is about the best you can do now.Comment
-
Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, Yes it's a faceless Inbox manned by illiterate buffoons..
There is no such thing as IR35 complaint by the way.
If you want to get your head around this, which you will need to do, I'd suggest you start with the IR35 guides to the right. Get the basics and then move on to the new legislation. It should become alot clearer.Last edited by northernladuk; 29 January 2020, 14:48.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThere is no such thing as IR35 complaint by the way.
Dear Client, I hereby complain...Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post(cough)
There is no such thing as IR35 complaint by the way.
If you want to get your head around this, which you will need to do, I'd suggest you start with the IR35 guides to the right. Get the basics and then move on to the new legislation. It should become alot clearer.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Yesterday 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Dec 3 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Comment