Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Help - IR35 has wrecked my brain
Collapse
X
-
Thanks again. So you wouldn't be overly concerned about extending the current contract even with the knowledge of knowing the client is not supportive of my Outside determination? -
Not overly concerned in the sense that the extra risk is just the extra time/tax exposure (which you've mitigated by conducting due dilligence), and you aren't proposing to hang around for much longer.Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks again. So you wouldn't be overly concerned about extending the current contract even with the knowledge of knowing the client is not supportive of my Outside determination?
Sure, I would be concerned that they aren't supportive (of your status at any time). But I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control. If you hadn't done the due diligence on this contract in advance or if you were proposing to stick around for a lot longer, I might given you a different answer (i.e., run now), but the damage is already done w/r to the client's view of your status.Comment
-
Have you spoke to them about your current predicament? I'd imagine you wouldn't be anywhere near the first contractor to approach them about this.Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, QDOS would just be reviewing a contract they have already passed as Compliant. I hear they are planning a new contract that works before and after 6th April - not sure how they will pull that trick!!The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Thanks, Yes it's a faceless Inbox manned by illiterate buffoons..Originally posted by LondonManc View PostHave you spoke to them about your current predicament? I'd imagine you wouldn't be anywhere near the first contractor to approach them about this.Comment
-
Thanks, I think the formal SDA will come in the next 2 to 3 weeks along with the new proposed contract - not sure if getting this makes things worse or not? Also when you say "I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control" - you mean in the future if anything transpires like an investigation?Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostNot overly concerned in the sense that the extra risk is just the extra time/tax exposure (which you've mitigated by conducting due dilligence), and you aren't proposing to hang around for much longer.
Sure, I would be concerned that they aren't supportive (of your status at any time). But I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control. If you hadn't done the due diligence on this contract in advance or if you were proposing to stick around for a lot longer, I might given you a different answer (i.e., run now), but the damage is already done w/r to the client's view of your status.Comment
-
Spoke = phoned?Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, Yes it's a faceless Inbox manned by illiterate buffoons..The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Probably not, except superficially. The client's opinion matters, and the SDS just formalises that. It would matter if you accepted the SDS and continued inside post April, but you're not going to, as I understand it.Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, I think the formal SDA will come in the next 2 to 3 weeks along with the new proposed contract - not sure if getting this makes things worse or not? Also when you say "I would be more concerned about refuting that, which is still within your control" - you mean in the future if anything transpires like an investigation?
On the latter, yes, in the event of a future investigation, HMRC and the client (presumably) will be against you, but the evidence will support you; that is about the best you can do now.Comment
-
(cough)Originally posted by MHPPM View PostThanks, Yes it's a faceless Inbox manned by illiterate buffoons..
There is no such thing as IR35 complaint by the way.
If you want to get your head around this, which you will need to do, I'd suggest you start with the IR35 guides to the right. Get the basics and then move on to the new legislation. It should become alot clearer.Last edited by northernladuk; 29 January 2020, 14:48.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Sure there is, the draft legislation allows for "complaints".Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThere is no such thing as IR35 complaint by the way.
Dear Client, I hereby complain...Comment
-
Sorry I don't follow what you are saying - maybe I am the illiterate buffoon.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post(cough)
There is no such thing as IR35 complaint by the way.
If you want to get your head around this, which you will need to do, I'd suggest you start with the IR35 guides to the right. Get the basics and then move on to the new legislation. It should become alot clearer.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Outside IR35 isn’t making a comeback in 2026/27 — it’s something more complex Yesterday 04:55
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Aug 3 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59

Comment