Originally posted by stonehenge
View Post
a) that one has already been to the FTT & UT whilst the other is nowhere to be seen?
b) that the arguments for one are known (and in the public domain) but in the other are a secret (even from those paying for them)?
c) that funds raised for one aren't invoiced nor have VAT added, but the other does?
d) that if there is any surplus contributions or if litigation does not proceed the contributors, rather than shareholders, get the excess?
e) all of the above.
I look forward to the BG sales and marketing team on CUK responding. Don't let me down Eek.
Leave a comment: