In early 2016 some of our clients had demands from Montpelier for partial repayment of their "loans".
We engaged a City law firm and a series of exchanges took place.
In July 2016, given the absence of information of counterclaim from the alleged lender, a final letter was sent saying that the liability had not fallen due and would not be repaid.
We have heard nothing since.
For a number of obvious reasons I am not going to detail how we arrived at that situation nor what was in the letters.
For largely the same reasons, I am not going to detail the strategy behind those letters and exchanges nor how this may be similar to or vary from the present crop of demands.
We engaged a City law firm and a series of exchanges took place.
In July 2016, given the absence of information of counterclaim from the alleged lender, a final letter was sent saying that the liability had not fallen due and would not be repaid.
We have heard nothing since.
For a number of obvious reasons I am not going to detail how we arrived at that situation nor what was in the letters.
For largely the same reasons, I am not going to detail the strategy behind those letters and exchanges nor how this may be similar to or vary from the present crop of demands.
Comment