Good decision here for taxpayer who did not have funds for his APNs...
http://financeandtax.decisions.tribu...30/TC06568.pdf
Judge says (of HMRC) -
"a reasonable person would be entitled to assume that a nearly eight year silence from HMRC
meant that there was unlikely to be much of a chance of having to pay the tax on the amendments,
and certainly not within a few months of a demand for tax coming out of the blue. Even if
they were told that the appeals had sprung to life and were to be contested before this
tribunal, a reasonable person would be entitled to assume that they would have much
longer than a few months from such an intimation to the date when any tax would have
to be paid."
http://financeandtax.decisions.tribu...30/TC06568.pdf
Judge says (of HMRC) -
"a reasonable person would be entitled to assume that a nearly eight year silence from HMRC
meant that there was unlikely to be much of a chance of having to pay the tax on the amendments,
and certainly not within a few months of a demand for tax coming out of the blue. Even if
they were told that the appeals had sprung to life and were to be contested before this
tribunal, a reasonable person would be entitled to assume that they would have much
longer than a few months from such an intimation to the date when any tax would have
to be paid."

Comment