• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

'compliant' arrangement

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by animallover View Post
    I feel some lawsuits coming on... And quick as well, before these companies disappear..
    Playing devils advocate for a second, if you bring a case before a UK court, (I do not know what case you would make, but setting that aside) and you won the case. What would the UK court be able to do to an entity that is off shore, the assets likewise - if there even are any recoverable assets that is. How will a UK court judgment benefit you? The people behind these schemes have basically done a runner with your money. They have had years to plan their exit. That money, even if it were traceable, is likely in a Cayman Islands, Panama, Belize, you name it anonymous account. I'm curious to understand where you intend going with such a court case.
    Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
    Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
      Playing devils advocate for a second, if you bring a case before a UK court, (I do not know what case you would make, but setting that aside) and you won the case. What would the UK court be able to do to an entity that is off shore, the assets likewise - if there even are any recoverable assets that is. How will a UK court judgment benefit you? The people behind these schemes have basically done a runner with your money. They have had years to plan their exit. That money, even if it were traceable, is likely in a Cayman Islands, Panama, Belize, you name it anonymous account. I'm curious to understand where you intend going with such a court case.
      Good points but the umbrella company is well established and definitely permanently UK based. Many of the payment companies are Isle of Man which is UK...? Not saying it will be straightforward but..

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by animallover View Post
        I feel some lawsuits coming on... And quick as well, before these companies disappear..
        Might want to read page 34+ of this: https://www.taxadvisermagazine.com/s...UNE-lowres.pdf

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by animallover View Post
          Good points but the umbrella company is well established and definitely permanently UK based. Many of the payment companies are Isle of Man which is UK...? Not saying it will be straightforward but..
          Sorry, IoM is not UK. They have their own parliament that writes their own laws. I know nothing about the so called umbrella company involved. They were just window dressing though, I'm guessing. The people you really need to take action against, I can pretty much guess how bullet proof (in all senses of the word) they will be given the years of planning they have had to prepare.
          Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
          Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Iliketax View Post
            Might want to read page 34+ of this: https://www.taxadvisermagazine.com/s...UNE-lowres.pdf
            Agreed - very good article and worth reading.
            Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.

            (No, me neither).

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Iliketax View Post
              Might want to read page 34+ of this: https://www.taxadvisermagazine.com/s...UNE-lowres.pdf
              Very good article. So, middle column, bottom of page 34. Who has gone to jail? How many?
              Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
              Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
                Very good article. So, middle column, bottom of page 34. Who has gone to jail? How many?
                No idea - but here's an example of a different type of scheme https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/...and-others.pdf

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Iliketax View Post
                  No idea - but here's an example of a different type of scheme https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/...and-others.pdf
                  Thanks, clearly, that prosecution was brought against the perpetrators central to the schemes. The problem I foresee with these tax avoidance schemes is that if an accountant is prosecuted, he was guilty of giving bad tax advice. The people who made the REAL money will still be swanning around in their multi million pound yachts. In that respect, the accountant is a victim of the scheme too. Albeit, not to the same extent as the scheme users. I imagine the worst that can happen to such an accountant would be a fine and a loss of professional standing.
                  Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
                  Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    HMRC should be going after the individuals responsible for creating the schemes i. E. The big players. It's all very well going after the little people but unless they go after the big boys, what's to dissuade the big players? Otherwise the HMRC are just bullies and cowards

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by animallover View Post
                      HMRC should be going after the individuals responsible for creating the schemes i. E. The big players. It's all very well going after the little people but unless they go after the big boys, what's to dissuade the big players? Otherwise the HMRC are just bullies and cowards
                      Quite agree, most people will, I guess. Question is, given that these people are now stinking rich, they are likely living the high life in Panama, Seychelles or some place. So, how exactly are the UK authorities going to pin anything on these guys that will actually stick? Don't forget, these are very rich people, if required, they can hire some very smart lawyers.
                      Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
                      Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X