Has anyone discussed that the providers of the EBT schemes are liable for the tax individuals are now owing. I feel really duped by the big sell "fully HMRC Compliant" gag and when the proverbial hits the fan they shut up shop and disappear!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Action against EBT Scheme providers?
Collapse
X
-
-
Sadly your tax is your responsibility. HMRC do not have a case against the suppliers. You, of course, may well have one on several points.Originally posted by damon123 View PostHas anyone discussed that the providers of the EBT schemes are liable for the tax individuals are now owing. I feel really duped by the big sell "fully HMRC Compliant" gag and when the proverbial hits the fan they shut up shop and disappear!Blog? What blog...?
-
There is little you can do except write it off to experience and not let it eat away at you.Originally posted by damon123 View PostHas anyone discussed that the providers of the EBT schemes are liable for the tax individuals are now owing. I feel really duped by the big sell "fully HMRC Compliant" gag and when the proverbial hits the fan they shut up shop and disappear!
The scheme providers were not regulated by the FSA (now FCA) in most cases. Even Premier, who were strongly connected with (possibly owned by) an accounting firm would have been insulated from the conditions that the accounting firm had to meet. So there is no statutory route to compensation.
Most providers have long gone. Those that remain would be protected by a whole series of disclaimers and as the previous poster said, ultimately the liability for your tax is with you.
We did look at whether the Isle of Man Government might be culpable for allowing so many trusts to make so many unsecured and uninvestigated loans. We came to the reluctant conclusion that they might be, but given the importance of the trust sector to the Isle of Man and the potential size of the issue, they Manx Government would defend to the death their position. They have also since introduced new regulation so they would run to that haven.
My advice is forget any thoughts of retribution financially and instead, if you want to take action, warn others not to sucked into what will no doubt be a new crop of schemes coming up soon.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment