Originally posted by webberg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BIG GROUP
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by bstar1 View PostWe have been raped and we've done nothing illegal.Comment
-
It's ready - read on
I've collated the feedback on the original paper into a short Q&A note and this is available as part of the below.
The key issues that were mentioned several times were;
1. Pace - we need it quickly
2. Clear and transparent strategy
3. Affordable
4. Private
The first of these points has led to a major alteration in structure. It was originally intended that the highly successful NTRT group structure would be replicated. Examination of that group shows that its success is largely due to the unpaid efforts of Mr Donkey Rhubarb and the amount of time he has dedicated to the effort. He has no equivalent amongst the diverse provider schemes that BIG GROUP is looking to represent. Finding such a person or more likely a group of willing volunteers would take an unknown length of time.
As a consequence of the above and in an effort to gain expedited momentum BIG GROUP will now be a service offered by me and my company.
This allows set up to go ahead quickly (tomorrow).
This means that the fees can come to my company along with the obligation to fund the technical and legal team that might be required, including those experts in areas like insolvency and other areas outside our specialism but which should be part of the offering.
The strategy remains the same - identify and deliver a negotiated settlement.
I've put some detail into the paper but will share the deeper analysis only with the confidential forum to prevent leakage of IP. Signed up members will gain access to this forum following an initial verification process.
One consequence of changing from a membership to a service, is VAT.
A membership fee is usually not VATable. Payment for a service is. I'm investigating further but for now I think I have to add VAT.
Therefore the £50 joining fee (from now until 31/12/15) becomes £50 plus VAT of £10. And the monthly fee becomes £15 plus VAT = £18.
WTT Consulting | Tax Enquiry Specialists | London
Go here and follow the links.
Most of this is available now but we're still adding material.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by webberg View PostI've collated the feedback on the original paper into a short Q&A note and this is available as part of the below.Comment
-
I've been asked whether contractors who participated the White Collar iterations that were not DOTAS registered are included in BIG GROUP for the fees laid out.
YES.
Although there is no DOTAS SRN it is included as it is in that part of the time spectrum we are covering.Best Forum Adviser & Forum Personality of the Year 2018.
(No, me neither).Comment
-
Great
Originally posted by webberg View PostI've been asked whether contractors who participated the White Collar iterations that were not DOTAS registered are included in BIG GROUP for the fees laid out.
YES.
Although there is no DOTAS SRN it is included as it is in that part of the time spectrum we are covering.
Thanks for setting this up.Comment
-
Excellent
Well done this is good stuff.
All of us caught in this mess should join in - the more members, the better chance it has of succeeding.Join Big Group - don't let them get away with it
http://www.wttbiggroup.co.uk/Comment
-
Thanks webberg, looks like good stuff!
One question,
"Collecting information and data on ALL schemes used between 1999 and 2011/12 to determine HMRC avenues of attack, defensive strengths and weaknesses and progress to date."
Does this mean BIG GROUP isn't planning on representing scheme users with open investigations for following years?
(Eg 2012/13)
ThanksComment
-
Application submitted
Looking forward to all the positive help that the Big Group can bringComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment