Originally posted by dirk
View Post
They have been very successful in getting well paid public names in the press with stories of tax avoidance. It's also a fact that many uninformed (in tax matters) people see no distinction between Starbucks paying very little (legitimately) in the UK and groups of modestly affluent people seeking to shave a few points off their liability.
It's like the old joke about Churchill and Lady Astor.
Churchill, "Would you sleep with me for £5?"
Astor "Certainly not!"
Churchill "How about £1m?"
Astor "I might, but what do you think I am?"
Churchill "We've established what you are, now we're negotiating a price"
Morally there is no difference between paying a plumber £20, cash in hand that you know he's not going to declare, and arranging a series of offshore companies to remove UK liability by the million. The latter just costs more to do.
Comment