1. Contracting
    1. General
      1. Brexit
    2. Business / Contracts
      1. Coronavirus Assistance
    3. Accounting / Legal
      1. Umbrella Companies
      2. HMRC Scheme Enquiries
      3. The Future of Contracting
      4. IR35 Reform
    4. Technical
    5. Welcome / FAQs
  2. Social
    1. Light Relief
    2. Social / Events
  • Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ban all drinks but water?

Collapse
X
11 to 20 of 42 Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
Collapse
Reply to Thread
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
11 to 20 of 42 Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next
    #11
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    You clearly have no clue what you are talking about.
    I'd retort by saying you're clearly an ignorant, arrogant, spiteful little man but everybody already knows that.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment

      #12
      Everything should be legal to eat/drink, leave it up to the person/parent to decide, natural selection will take care of it.

      Comment

        #13
        Originally posted by Unix View Post
        Everything should be legal to eat/drink, leave it up to the person/parent to decide, natural selection will take care of it.
        Fortunately, I don't think anyone is suggesting making any foods or drinks illegal.
        The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

        George Frederic Watts

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

        Comment

          #14
          Originally posted by speling bee View Post
          Fortunately, I don't think anyone is suggesting making any foods or drinks illegal.
          1000% tax is the equivalent of a ban for most working class people.

          Comment

            #15
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            I'd retort by saying you're clearly an ignorant, arrogant, spiteful little man but everybody already knows that.
            fight, fight!

            Comment

              #16
              Originally posted by Unix View Post
              1000% tax is the equivalent of a ban for most working class people.
              True, but as far as I'm aware it's only Brillo proposing that. Such a ban would be easily circumvented by adding sugar to drinks. Invest is Sodastream now.
              The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

              George Frederic Watts

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

              Comment

                #17
                Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                True, but as far as I'm aware it's only Brillo proposing that. Such a ban would be easily circumvented by adding sugar to drinks. Invest is Sodastream now.
                Yeah my post was in reply to his thread, sorry if that wasn't clear.

                Comment

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Unix View Post
                  Yeah my post was in reply to his thread, sorry if that wasn't clear.
                  No trouble at all!
                  The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                  George Frederic Watts

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                  Comment

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Unix View Post
                    Everything should be legal to eat/drink, leave it up to the person/parent to decide, natural selection will take care of it.
                    Natural selection deals with slow changes. That's why environment changes happening over even "slow" time periods like a thousand years can easily wipe out an entire species. Once a species is able to alter its environment, natural selection loses its efficacy. For instance, we can keep people alive and reproducing who have all kinds of traits that are undesirable.

                    The entire history of humans as we define the term is the merest blink of an eye, we could quite easily wipe ourselves out before natural selection has a chance to catch up
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment

                      #20
                      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                      I'd retort by saying you're clearly an ignorant, arrogant, spiteful little man but everybody already knows that.
                      Well I am not the one with a weight problem.

                      Comment

                      Reply to Thread
                      11 to 20 of 42 Previous 1 2 3 4 5 template Next

                      Advertisers

                      1. Contracting
                        1. General
                          1. Brexit
                        2. Business / Contracts
                          1. Coronavirus Assistance
                        3. Accounting / Legal
                          1. Umbrella Companies
                          2. HMRC Scheme Enquiries
                          3. The Future of Contracting
                          4. IR35 Reform
                        4. Technical
                        5. Welcome / FAQs
                      2. Social
                        1. Light Relief
                        2. Social / Events
                      Working...
                      X