Originally posted by MyUserName
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Rebecca Brooks ' not guilty' Andy Coulson 'Guilty'
Collapse
X
-
I think they phoned the victim's number and entered the default PIN that they hadn't bothered to change. The word "hacking" suggests it was in some way difficult, and as has been said they in no way accessed any phones.Will work inside IR35. Or for food. -
Umm. Except they did actually hack the phones.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI think they phoned the victim's number and entered the default PIN that they hadn't bothered to change. The word "hacking" suggests it was in some way difficult, and as has been said they in no way accessed any phones.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Three won't let me use 1234 OR 4321. Grrrr.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostA couple of networks now make you change your PIN when you set up voicemail.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
I wonder why.....Originally posted by VectraMan View PostThree won't let me use 1234 OR 4321. Grrrr.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
You could call your mobile number from any phone and, I think (memory is a bit dodgy now!!), you entered a # or similar as it dialled and it put you through to the voicemail. Enter your pin (1234 or 0000 was the default) to listen. Most people obviously didn't change their pin numbers going by the amount of people "hacked".
It's not really hacking in my view as it didn't take much technical knowledge to do it.
That's the reason that getting the royal family phone book was so important as they only needed the phone numbers to virtually guarantee getting into the voicemails.Comment
-
Have you tried 1111 ?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostThree won't let me use 1234 OR 4321. Grrrr.Comment
-
-
The journalists being jailed was all over the news yesterday.
They even interviewed one who was sentenced in her absence on one of the news programs. She just has to be careful where she travels.
Funny world - journalists being jailed for reporting the news and being accused of being crooked, and journalists being jailed for actually being crooked.
I forgot to add that the UK is one of the countries that is suppose to have a free and uncorrupted news media. This sentencing of a newspaper editor means that we are officially corrupt.Last edited by SueEllen; 24 June 2014, 14:56."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Surely it means that we're officially not free? Why would it mean we're corrupt?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostI forgot to add that the UK is one of the countries that is suppose to have a free and uncorrupted news media. This sentencing of a newspaper editor means that we are officially corrupt.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
I think it should say "this former editor (and former Director of Communications for the Prime Minister) being found guilty" given that he hasn't been sentenced to anything yet.Originally posted by speling bee View PostSurely it means that we're officially not free? Why would it mean we're corrupt?
As to whether a newspaper editor (and former Director of Communications for the Prime Minister) being determined by a jury in a court of law to be a lying weasel makes the UK corrupt: maybe it means we're not, as if we were he would have got away with it.
On the other hand, he did get away with it for an awfully long time; and I didn't see the once-Australian, now-American person who was paying his salary, presumably on the basis of the results of these illegal activities, being brought before the court.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment