• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Iraqi Civil war now official and under way

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
    Wouldn't call that severe repression....
    So do you think Saudi Arabia is severely repressive of gays?
    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

    George Frederic Watts

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

    Comment


      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
      Wouldn't call that severe repression....
      So stoning isn't severe enough, you'd prefer the gas chamber ?
      Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

      No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

      Comment


        Two Sides of the Same Coin

        Lets face it Iran and Saudi are both as bad as each other. On one side you have fundamentalist shi-ites who want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms, on the other side you have fundamentalist sunnis who want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms. If it wasn't for a particular event in history they would all be on the same side who would still want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms...

        Comment


          Originally posted by kal View Post
          Lets face it Iran and Saudi are both as bad as each other. On one side you have fundamentalist shi-ites who want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms, on the other side you have fundamentalist sunnis who want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms. If it wasn't for a particular event in history they would all be on the same side who would still want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms...
          I disagree with that. They may both be severely repressive but Saudi is significantly worse, and Iran has some aspects of civil society that we should find encouraging. And also, my beef is with the state and government of Iran, not the people. Iran was showing signs of becoming a flourishing democracy before the CIA toppled the democratic government.
          The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

          George Frederic Watts

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

          Comment


            Originally posted by kal View Post
            Lets face it Iran and Saudi are both as bad as each other. On one side you have fundamentalist shi-ites who want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms, on the other side you have fundamentalist sunnis who want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms. If it wasn't for a particular event in history they would all be on the same side who would still want to control what people say/think/wear/do coupled with a hatred of the west and its freedoms...
            Sounding like the BBC.

            Comment


              Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
              Sounding like the BBC.
              What do you think you sound like?
              The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

              George Frederic Watts

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

              Comment


                Iran was fine in the 60s and 70s untill Islam fuct it up. Women could dress how they wanted and people were free.

                Page F30: Iran in the 1970s before the Islamic Revolution

                Then



                Now

                Comment


                  Originally posted by CloudWalker View Post
                  Iran was fine in the 60s and 70s untill Islam fuct it up. Women could dress how they wanted and people were free.

                  Page F30: Iran in the 1970s before the Islamic Revolution

                  Then



                  Now

                  And here we have Fox news.....

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by CloudWalker View Post
                    Iran was fine in the 60s and 70s untill Islam fuct it up. Women could dress how they wanted and people were free.
                    So what do you make of political oppression under the Shah following the 1953 CIA backed coup against the democratic government? Was that 'free'?
                    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                    George Frederic Watts

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                      So perhaps UK have got it about right, so you think?
                      The freedom to believe in superstitious nonsense or walk around like assassins is the exact same freedom to hold a public nude event; erode one and you erode the other.
                      But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X