• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Iraq is back

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    You cannot compare the total bodycount of 30 years of Saddam with one week of these insurgents.

    What this 'invasion' threatens is turning Iraq into a militant islamic state, far more dangerous to world than Saddam, which is something Saddam had prevented during his reign.

    The area is uncontrollable by us, so it was best left to its own devices with strong men like Saddam, unpleasant as they are, keeping a tin lid on people much worse than he was.
    Saddam killed millions over 30 years by being a brutal dictator and oppressing people to the max. If you ask me I'd rather be killed with freedom than live under constant oppression and tyranny.

    <Braveheart Mode>

    You can take our lives but you can't take our FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOM

    </Braveheart Mode>

    Anybody who thinks life under Saddam is better than it is now has no idea what it is to live without any human rights or dignity.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post

      <Braveheart Mode>

      You can take our lives but you can't take our deep fried mars bars

      </Braveheart Mode>
      FTFY
      Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

      No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
        You cannot compare the total bodycount of 30 years of Saddam with one week of these insurgents.

        What this 'invasion' threatens is turning Iraq into a militant islamic state, far more dangerous to world than Saddam, which is something Saddam had prevented during his reign.

        The area is uncontrollable by us, so it was best left to its own devices with strong men like Saddam, unpleasant as they are, keeping a tin lid on people much worse than he was.
        Sadman Insane killed a million people over 20 or thirty years.
        It's widely believed (eg MITs study, etc) that over a million people have died as a result of the invasion ten years ago.

        That's in a country of 25 million-ish in 2000.

        I think one would have to be some kind of psycho to suggest that 'we' did them a favour.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by original PM View Post
          It is interesting that - because if you ractchet it down a notch and then look at some companies whose exec have simply no interest in the human beings that work for the company other than what they can do to earn the execs more money.

          Sometimes at least these dictators were honest in their view of human life - unlike many of today's 'ethical business leaders'

          Think I am spounting tulip?

          Try this Link
          Hmm... except that when you were being murdered by Mao & the gang, it wasn't a voluntary association. Complaining about how your boss treats you is something done by bet-wetters who want something for nothing.

          Comment


            #45
            The thing that really gets me is this; 11 years ago, everyone I know, all my family, people at work, people in the pub - all of them to a man could see that our involvement in Iraq was stirring up one big hornet's nest. And I can say exactly the same thing about our misguided efforts in Libya and Syria in the ensuing years.

            And that is exactly what has happened - look at it; it beggars belief, you just couldn't make it up. And the cruelest irony of all - it's all happening on the watch of Middle East Peace Envoy Tony Blair. Great job you're doing there Tone.

            Now, I know politicians are out of touch but I can't really believe they buy that "hands across the ocean" tripe of how these totalitarian regimes, after our intervention, are going to blossom into western style democracies and become part of some global rainbow league of nations, or whatever it was Blair had in his mind. I really can't.

            So, what exactly is the plan? What do they want to get from all this chaos that has resulted from their policies?

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post
              The thing that really gets me is this; 11 years ago, everyone I know, all my family, people at work, people in the pub - all of them to a man could see that our involvement in Iraq was stirring up one big hornet's nest. And I can say exactly the same thing about our misguided efforts in Libya and Syria in the ensuing years.

              And that is exactly what has happened - look at it; it beggars belief, you just couldn't make it up. And the cruelest irony of all - it's all happening on the watch of Middle East Peace Envoy Tony Blair. Great job you're doing there Tone.

              Now, I know politicians are out of touch but I can't really believe they buy that "hands across the ocean" tripe of how these totalitarian regimes, after our intervention, are going to blossom into western style democracies and become part of some global rainbow league of nations, or whatever it was Blair had in his mind. I really can't.

              So, what exactly is the plan? What do they want to get from all this chaos that has resulted from their policies?
              Blair now earns many millions a year. That's what they get out of it.

              Comment

              Working...
              X