• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Captains of Industry demand more immigrants

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Captains of Industry demand more immigrants

    The leaders of Britain's biggest businesses employing millions of people have called on the Government to allow unlimited immigration from Bulgaria and Romania when the two former Eastern Bloc states join the European Union next year.

    They said any break in the "open door" policy that has seen hundreds of thousands of migrants from Poland and other eastern European countries come to Britain would be a major mistake. The business leaders have put their names to a statement issued by the Business for New Europe Group (BNEG), a pressure group calling for further integration.

    Their support for a continued influx of workers will create a fresh headache for the Government, which is struggling to contain a political rebellion, and threatens to split the business community.

    Five of the group's advisory council, including the UK heads of Sainsbury, the supermarket giant, Centrica, which owns British Gas, and Merrill Lynch, the Wall Street investment bank, have put their names to the letter.

    But it is understood to have the support of other members of the council that numbers the heads of Carphone Warehouse, Alliance Boots, the high street chemists, the oil giant BP and the power company National Grid as members.

    The BNEG's statement said: "If Bulgaria and Romania join the EU at the beginning of next year, the UK should continue with its open door policy.

    "A so-called pause in migration from these countries would be tantamount to a reversal of policy and could work against Britain's interests."

    The leaders criticised Government ministers for "equivocating" in the face of "scare stories" in the right-wing media about a flood of Romanian and Bulgarian migrants. "The simple fact is that workers from other European countries come to the UK because there are jobs," the business leaders said. "It is a cause for support, not retrenchment.

    "We believe that in reaching its decision the UK Government should be guided both by economic reason and by recent historical experience."

    The intervention comes at an awkward time for the Cabinet, which is moving towards controls on immigration in the face of pressure from the Conservatives.

    Last week, Damian Green, the shadow Immigration minister, said the Government had to learn the lesson of the "unprecedented numbers" who arrived in the UK after the last EU expansion in 2004. The Government had forecast tens of thousands of migrants rather than the 600,000 who have come in since 2004.

    Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, has said immigration from Romania and Bulgaria would be "properly controlled" when the two countries join the EU next year.

    Ed Balls, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, said yesterday that the Government wanted "managed" immigration rather than an "open-door" policy when more countries were admitted to the EU. "We've seen some real contributions to our labour market from, for example, young Polish workers coming to meet skills shortages in Britain," he told the BBC. "At the same time we're going to have to look very carefully at these issues in the next few months because we need to make sure we continue with a disciplined and managed approach."

    A spokeswoman for the Home Office said the Government would make a decision on the "level of access" workers from Romania and Bulgaria would have to the labour market after the European Council meets in October. "That will be based on an objective assessment of factors such as the British economy, including the labour market, the impact of previous enlargements and the position of other member states."

    But Roger Carr, the chairman of Centrica, said ministers could not pick and choose which elements of an open-market system they liked. "It is essential to harvest the upside and manage the downside on the side of market freedom not protectionism," he said.

    However, their support for the BNEG statement puts them in opposition to most of the mainstream business organisations. The CBI, the largest employers' group, said immigrants from Poland had benefited the economy by filling skills gaps in areas such as building and catering. But it said it was essential the Government reflected on the experience since the 2004 enlargement that added 10 new members before deciding on its approach to Romanians and Bulgarians.
    Susan Anderson, the CBI's director of human resources policy, told The Independent: "Let's be clear, it's not a question of if the UK should open to Bulgaria and Romania [but] it is right that the UK takes the time to reflect on the earlier experiences and debates how and when to welcome the next phase of EU accession countries."

    David Frost, the director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, said that the recent rise in unemployment to a six-year high was flashing a warning signal about the impact of migration of the indigenous workforce. "We have seen unemployment rise in the UK and clearly we don't want to be in a position where we are seeing migrant labour coming in and getting the jobs and supporting the great number of local people have not got jobs," he said.

    "That's not a recipe for success. It will not be a cohesive society." He blamed the Government for failing to provide an education system that enabled Britons to find work in the modern labour market.

    A raft of economic reports has shown that immigration has boosted the UK economy by about £2.5bn a year. Last week Grant Thornton, the business advisers, said immigration had added between 0.5 and 1 percentage points to growth last year, without which Gordon Brown would have failed to hit his targets. Mr Balls said the influx of workers to meet skill gaps had helped keep a lid on wage growth that in turn had helped keep interest rates low.

    Martin Sorrell, the chief executive of WPP, the world's largest advertising business, said the 2004 enlargement had been a "great success". "The Polish plumber has become a much-loved feature of British life," he said. "The migration has plugged gaps in the labour market and boosted economic growth."

    Anthony Ullmann, the chairman of BNEG's entrepreneurs' council, said free movement of labour within the UK had been a "huge boon". "It has allowed people from the UK to seek opportunities in Europe, whilst at the same time giving our labour markets a timely boost," he said.

    Immigration: The facts

    600,000 people from eastern Europe have successfully applied for the right to work in the United Kingdom over the past two years. This means that they now account for 2 per cent of the country's 30 million strong workforce

    62 per cent of the new workers have come from Poland

    £2.54bn is contributed to the economy annually by eastern European immigrants in the UK

    0.5-1 per cent of economic growth in the United Kingdom in 2005 and 2006 has been contributed by migrants

    70,000 migrant workers help with harvesting farms, according to the National Farmers Union

    10 per cent of employees on Britain's building sites are from overseas - making a total labour force of up to 100,000 workers

    80 per cent of new migrants are working people between the ages of 18 and 35. This offsets the tendency for the country's population to age, addressing the difficulties in providing for an ageing population. There is evidence that National Insurance contributions would have to be higher under lower migration scenarios

    250,000 jobs a year are created by the UK economy. The economy continues to grow only because there is the population to carry such continued growth

    31 per cent of doctors working in hospitals and general practices throughout the UK are migrants

    13 per cent of nurses who are working in the UK were born abroad

    12.5 cent of teaching staff working in schools across the UK are non-British

    70 per cent of catering jobs in London are filled by migrant workers

    13 per cent higher average wages earned by migrant workers (compared to workers who are not migrants) suggests that migrant workers are more highly skilled and more productive

    #2
    Bunch of arse!

    Thats my learned opinion anyway...

    Older and ...well, just older!!

    Comment


      #3
      Does seem to be business - i.e. demand for cheap labour to maximise proft driven.

      In the 1950s the textile industry demanded Pakistani immigration , we are now living with the legacy

      But the captains of industry can always retire out of harms way once their money is made
      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

      Comment


        #4
        Yes, the winners are the likes of Lord Sainsbury (friend of Tony and MAJOR New Lie party donor). Their profit margins rise nicely on the back of cheap, exploitable labour.

        All we get are more social issues, further overcrowding, strained public services and transport, housing shortages and higher unemployment.

        Just say NO (or better still, STOP VOTING LABOUR)

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Troll
          Does seem to be business - i.e. demand for cheap labour to maximise proft driven.

          In the 1950s the textile industry demanded Pakistani immigration , we are now living with the legacy

          But the captains of industry can always retire out of harms way once their money is made
          Of course its business driven!

          Amazing that some here thougth immigration was due to a lack of control on the Governments behalf.

          Wrong , its a policy designed to enrich our Elite.

          PS DP doesnt matter whom you vote for ..the Government always gets in !



          Tony Blair will do anything to impress the Elite which he sees himself part of as he salivates overs his future earnings in the US.

          Im sure the Elite deserve it.

          And to hell with the consequences.

          Now then ...back to work with the lot of you before I replace you with a Cheap Immigrant !
          Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 30 August 2006, 10:30.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Troll
            Does seem to be business - i.e. demand for cheap labour to maximise proft driven.

            In the 1950s the textile industry demanded Pakistani immigration , we are now living with the legacy

            But the captains of industry can always retire out of harms way once their money is made

            Thats the point, labour is now a commodity to be sourced as cheaply as possible, processed to add value - for the lowest cost possible, and sold on to the highest bidder.

            The definition of labour is expanding as well. Jobs that were not considered unskilled or semi-skilled before now fall into that category. Hell desk and hardware support roles are already more or less in this category and coding is rapidly heading that way. Indian IT companies are taking cheap labour, training to a minimal standard and selling on at a premium.

            To stay ahead we have to avoid being sucked into the "labour pool" and make sure we are in a position where we can sell non-commodity skills into the market place at premium rates.
            "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

            Comment


              #7
              The trend in the employment rate is broadly flat while the trend in the unemployment rate continues to increase. "

              If we all bring sandwiches to work would that mean that the 70% in catering in London will all p1ss off home?
              How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

              Comment


                #8
                http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../29/nimm29.xml

                Immigrants unable to earn more than £27,000 a year should not be allowed to settle in Britain because they do not make "a positive contribution", a report says today.

                This might be a solution...

                Victor

                One among the new "undesirables"...
                The rest is silence...

                Comment


                  #9
                  To stay ahead we have to avoid being sucked into the "labour pool" and make sure we are in a position where we can sell non-commodity skills into the market place at premium rates.

                  Interesting thought Dave.

                  From my perspective view my former skills of Piano Tuning and Repair is far more lucrative than my IT skill set ... but Im unsure as to what you mean by non commodity Dave ?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    For all the talk of moving with the times and the modern global economy, I honestly believe the captains of industry would love Britain to return to Victorian times, with legions of cheap foreign workers replacing the indigenous poor (non-)working class.
                    Its just easier for them than turning around New Labour's "make everyone an academic genius who won't get their hands dirty" policy.
                    What happens to the social security bill in 5 or 10 years time?
                    Probably over half of them are paid in cash and don't even pay any tax or NI into the system.
                    Last edited by GreenerGrass; 30 August 2006, 10:52.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X