Originally posted by Brussels Slumdog
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Why should we interfere in Nigeria and not in Iraq?
Collapse
X
-
That might be the case but DA is not working with the Nigerian extremists. They told him to sod off as there is no way they would resort to recruitment consultants! -
It's all okay.
Apparently a lot of the girls have learnt the first few verses of the Koran and have realised the error of their ways.
So they are no longer prisoners but are there willingly.
Apparently.
Bet they still do not open the gates.
Also quite funny how a few days back they were going to sell them as slaves but now that seems to have gone out of the window - maybe someone pointed out the irony of that to them????Comment
-
Nigeria exports oil just like Iraq you know!Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAnyone got the answer to this?
Oil reserves in NigeriaWork in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
NO, Lord Lugard didn't have a funny hat. Just a funny moustache.Originally posted by zeitghostGad sir, back in my day we controlled the place largely with a chap in a funny hat.

And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Is that why you are wearing a funny hat in your avatar?Originally posted by zeitghostGad sir, back in my day we controlled the place largely with a chap in a funny hat.

Comment
-
Well now it's obvious why Britain lost the Nigerian colonies. In the annual funny hat contest, Her Majesty's representatives didn't stand a chance against these local chaps. Some spectators were so amazed they rushed out to see the show without even getting dressed!
Last edited by Mich the Tester; 13 May 2014, 11:32.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
How could I miss him? Holding his trusty table tennis bat up to his face. Carruthers was always a master of disguise!Originally posted by zeitghostThat's Carruthers.
He's the one in the middle.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment