If there were any morality about taxation then maybe there is an issue. Most people however look upon tax a s a means to punish people for daring to be wealthy. I would further argue that gary barlow et al are better spenders of their own wealth than UK government.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
A million tax pounds
Collapse
X
-
-
Bloody hell, we still agree on some things.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostIf there were any morality about taxation then maybe there is an issue. Most people however look upon tax a s a means to punish people for daring to be wealthy. I would further argue that gary barlow et al are better spenders of their own wealth than UK government.
OK, so essential public services need to be paid for, and we could debate what's 'essential' until we're all blue in the teeth, but I see a disturbing tendency towards jealousy among many people, especially when they talk about taxing 'the rich' or the 'multinationals'. It's not just jealousy from the left; at the weekend I was in the UK and had a look at the Daily Wail and the Times, as they were delivered to Tester Senior Towers; the Wail was on about Prince William spending lots of money to get his house decorated, and the Times was on about Britain's richest man. Why this obsession with how much money other people have? I couldn't give a stuff if Gary Barlow has earned millions by working away at the one thing he does quite well or some retail guy has done well by selling lots of perfume; well done to them.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
So do you think that taxation should only be used to pay for essential public services?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostBloody hell, we still agree on some things.
OK, so essential public services need to be paid for, and we could debate what's 'essential' until we're all blue in the teeth, but I see a disturbing tendency towards jealousy among many people, especially when they talk about taxing 'the rich' or the 'multinationals'. It's not just jealousy from the left; at the weekend I was in the UK and had a look at the Daily Wail and the Times, as they were delivered to Tester Senior Towers; the Wail was on about Prince William spending lots of money to get his house decorated, and the Times was on about Britain's richest man. Why this obsession with how much money other people have? I couldn't give a stuff if Gary Barlow has earned millions by working away at the one thing he does quite well or some retail guy has done well by selling lots of perfume; well done to them.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
As I said, what is 'essential' is very debatable. I would include some things that others would not include, like some level of support for the arts; my point is about jealousy, and not the existence of taxation.Originally posted by speling bee View PostSo do you think that taxation should only be used to pay for essential public services?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Do you mean jealousy, envy or covetousness?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAs I said, what is 'essential' is very debatable. I would include some things that others would not include, like some level of support for the arts; my point is about jealousy, and not the existence of taxation.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
1 and 3. Envy is a slightly less negatively loaded word in my understanding.Originally posted by speling bee View PostDo you mean jealousy, envy or covetousness?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
So the government stuffs loads of money to bankers, makes them filthy rich and provides cheap immigrants to do their dirty work.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post1 and 3. Envy is a slightly less negatively loaded word in my understanding.
And you expect people not to be jealous?
People don't mind those who are rich through working hard and creating jobs. Its parasites (like DA) which f**ks everyone right off. And immigrants who only benefit the rich.
We need a fairer society. Which we won't get under Labour - they are as bad as the Torys.Comment
-
Which "most people" do you refer to? I would argue very few people disagree we should pay taxes - even the people who go to great lengths to avoid (or evade) paying tax are probably in favour of tax in a general sense.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostIf there were any morality about taxation then maybe there is an issue. Most people however look upon tax a s a means to punish people for daring to be wealthy.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Of course they are in favour of tax. Just in other people paying it - not them. Not matter how much they have its never enough. Never mind that they are going to die and take nothing with them.Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhich "most people" do you refer to? I would argue very few people disagree we should pay taxes - even the people who go to great lengths to avoid (or evade) paying tax are probably in favour of tax in a general sense.Comment
-
Problem is there you have quoted two seperate things and made out that they are joined.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostSo the government stuffs loads of money to bankers, makes them filthy rich and provides cheap immigrants to do their dirty work.
SNIP.
1) The government used taxpayers money to bail out banks - Correct
2) The government allows cheap labour in from overseas - True ish...
But the two cannot be made into 1 sentence implying they are in some way joinedComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment