Distribution of electricity is not free - for example around (AFAIK) 1/3rd of power is lost due to National Grid: so if powerplants were closer to the end users, then less (30%!) energy would need to be generated.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Xsl
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Yes I know but I was thinking in terms of a wider solution - after all take the US out of the picture and we must have a 50% gain in available power.
BTW should have said all of my favourite Brasilians.Comment
-
Look my little Russian bunny rabbit, that was Soviet technology of the cold war era. British technology is far safer. And anyway oil and coal has caused many more deaths through war and pollution than civil nuclear power. We are bathed in radiation from the sun every day and it causes cancer too.Originally posted by AtWRetard - when Chernobyl had issues (and it was not a full blown explosion) then thousands miles away people had increase in cancer and other illnesses. If something happens with reactor in Scotland then everyone might as well leave this island for a thousand years or so.Comment
-
We all need radiant energy collectors.
Only problem is that only few have been constructed and the people who construct them usually go missing.
That is all.Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...Comment
-
Indeed. I remember reading in papers that one private contractor for British nuclear stations forgot to use lead screen in radioactive container and it was beaming literally death ray while it was driven for few hundred miles: it was pure luck that noone got covered by that small but deadly ray. Perhaps someone did - we will know in some years.Originally posted by JabberwockyBritish technology is far safer.Comment
-
Utter nonsenseOriginally posted by AtWIndeed. I remember reading in papers that one private contractor for British nuclear stations forgot to use lead screen in radioactive container and it was beaming literally death ray while it was driven for few hundred miles: it was pure luck that noone got covered by that small but deadly ray. Perhaps someone did - we will know in some years.
What sort of radioactive material was in that container that could emit this lethal death ray?
If it was that radioactive, a bit of lead shielding isn't going to make that much difference.
Clearly you don't know anything about nuclear physics (either) !
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Wasn't there a program on the BBC recently claiming that the radiation damage from Chernobyl was an exaggeration?
Burning coal dumps huge amounts of radioactive particles into the atmosphere, far more than any of the nuclear escapades of the last century.Blair, you cannot reach me now,
No matter how you try,
Goodbye cruel Labour,
Your end is nigh.
International Talk Like a Pirate DayComment
-
Tell this to families in Belorussia and Ukraine who had freaks born.Originally posted by CaribbeanPirateWasn't there a program on the BBC recently claiming that the radiation damage from Chernobyl was an exaggeration?Comment
-
-
This was the point of the story - there wasn't any freaks.Originally posted by AtWTell this to families in Belorussia and Ukraine who had freaks born.Blair, you cannot reach me now,
No matter how you try,
Goodbye cruel Labour,
Your end is nigh.
International Talk Like a Pirate DayComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57

Comment