Originally posted by xoggoth
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
One more reason to leave the EU
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Mich the Tester; 16 April 2014, 10:29.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Originally posted by Gittins Gal View PostFor the hundredth time, I AM NOT, NEVER HAVE BEEN, AND NEVER WILL BE this Gricer bot that you're all so obsessed with. Neither, for that matter, am I a female impersonator.
But then I suspect that accuracy doesn't matter.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostYou can't overestimate people's stupidity.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostOh well if you care about accuracy, you might have noticed that I am not an 'EU cheerleader', I simply hold a more nuanced opinion on the in/out (false) dichotomy than some others; I call for Britain to stay in and reform instead of leaving and trying to do some deal afterwards. That's not exactly a wholesale approval of everything the EU does, now, is it?
But then I suspect that accuracy doesn't matter.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Originally posted by Gittins Gal View PostFor the hundredth time, I AM NOT, NEVER HAVE BEEN, AND NEVER WILL BE this Gricer bot that you're all so obsessed with. Neither, for that matter, am I a female impersonator.
Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostThe only way we'd have a chance of reform is we could kick France and Germany out of the EU they hold all the strings, realistically leaving or at least threatening to leave (and meaning it) is our only optionAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWell, let's wait and see what can be negotiated. I think a lot of you will be confounded by the results, because I actually see a lot of what's going on on this side of the North Sea. But let's not let knowledge get in the way of a good old harrumph.Comment
-
Originally posted by Platypus View PostInteresting. It's my feeling that any attempt to reform or renegotiate our relationship with the EU will quickly hit a brick wall, but for now it suits the politicians to talk about reform as it seems to offer a "third way". Smoke & Mirrors IMO. We should leave the EU.
But then if you live in the UK, hear the conversations in the UK, and primarily read the UK's largely eurosceptic press (on the right at least), you wouldn't get that impression.
Anyway, I'm fooking bored of the whole thing; let's face it, facts aren't going to determine the matter, emotions are, and there's no arguing with emotions. Although the timing of a referendum or future election will be interesting given UKIP's demographics.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Is it? Are birth rates among other EU nationalities much higher than among Britons?Official data show that more than a quarter of all births are to non-UK born women, which has boosted the population aged 0 to 8 years by nearly 300,000 since the last census in 2001. Polish women overtook those from Pakistan as the single largest group of foreign-born mothers in 2010 and 2011, accounting for more than 10 per cent of births within this group.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
Yes, Poles have a higher birth rate than other EU nationalities, although I wonder if that's offset by Italians (who form a large proportion of EU migrants recently) having very low birth rates. I also wonder how much Polish migration is permanent and how much will turn out to be transitory or circular. Poland's economic growth would suggest the pull factors over there are growing and the trend may stop or slowly reverse. Polish culture may go through a similar secularisation to Irish, Italian or Spanish culture leading to a similar fall in birth rates. Or possibly the urbanisation of migrants leading to lower birth rates in the second generation. While the numbers are unknowns, what is pretty certain is that a big rich city like London will attract national AND international migrants and it's better for everyone if governments take account of that.
I also think Britain might reduce the incentives to less desirable migrants by reinstating the difference between residence based benefits (like income support) and contribution based benefits, which would enable the UK to quite legitimately send away EU migrants who can't support themselves without resorting to the state (excepting of course contribution based employee insurance), as the Belgian government has just done, telling 2000 Dutch people to leave who were not working, not contributing but claiming residence based benefits. This was a true bugger up by the Labour government in Britain. Free money, apparently!
But then it's difficult to comment as I can't read the article!And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment