• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

NSS - migrants displace workers.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    What's stopping the UK deporting criminals?
    we can deport them but having reasonably porous borders and a default assumption that EU entrants are admitted they seem to return with ease.
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by vetran View Post
      we can deport them but having reasonably porous borders and a default assumption that EU entrants are admitted they seem to return with ease.
      They can be excluded for definite and indefinite periods for committing crimes. The EU's rules on freedom of movement don't stop you doing that, as long as you get British law sorted out.

      The important principle is proportionality; you can't deport an EU national for getting drunk and stumbling home, but if he presents a danger you can deport him of you follow the correct procedure which is actually pretty much standard in British law anyway.

      Proportionality
      When it comes to public policy and public security, measures taken on these grounds must
      be:
      • proportionate (expulsion is a very considerable interference in a person's life and must
      be proportionate to the seriousness of the breach of public policy or public security); and
      • based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned which
      must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of
      the fundamental interests of society.

      http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies...vement_low.pdf
      Last edited by Mich the Tester; 6 March 2014, 12:35.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by vetran View Post
        we can deport them but having reasonably porous borders and a default assumption that EU entrants are admitted they seem to return with ease.
        The fact that an island can have open borders, is a deliberate failure by sucessive governments
        Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

        No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
          The fact that an island can have open borders, is a deliberate policy by sucessive governments
          ftfy.

          they want cheap labour to hold wages down. MandelSlime admitted it.
          Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
            The fact that an island can have open borders, is a deliberate failure by sucessive governments
            How open are the UK's borders? I remember that 20 years ago I used to arrive at East Midlands airport and be waved through by a guy sitting in casual clothes behind a passport desk, reading (or looking at tits in) the Sun. Nowadays when I arrive at airports I see a row (if I'm lucky and they've staffed all the desks) of uniformed officials who proceed to ask me how long I intend to stay in the UK (I'd like to say 'as long as I bloody well like', being a British citizen, but I'd rather avoid the hassle), taking a long look at my passport and staring me in the face, and so on. If I get the train from Brussels I go through Belgian passport control and then 5 metres further up through UK passport control.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by vetran View Post
              they want cheap labour to hold wages down. MandelSlime admitted it.
              That's what "Business friendly" means. Anything else makes you unelectable.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                If that is what everyone who isn't as intelligent as SAS thinks he is.
                Nothing to do with being more intelligent than most, although statistically I am.
                The reason why I'm prospering is that more than 10 years ago during a slow down in the economy (post dot com crash) where I couldn't find a job, I uprooted myself from my cosy life in London, rented out my flat, got into debt to re-train in a Masters degree on the other side of the country, in a city where I knew no-one. I was a 30+ guy living in a student house. I then had to re-establish myself in a changed career so that I could pay my London mortgage. That took about 3 years where I had to rent.

                It was fooking hard but now I'm coining it.

                So you'll forgive me if I have no fooking sympathy at all with lazy whining fookers who expect every-fooking-thing on a fooking plate.
                Ok?
                Hard Brexit now!
                #prayfornodeal

                Comment


                  #28
                  but does keeping wages down make UK products more competitive in the marketplace or just allow senior management to take bigger bonuses...

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    So you'll forgive me if I have no fooking sympathy at all with lazy whining fookers who expect every-fooking-thing on a fooking plate.
                    +1
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                      Nothing to do with being more intelligent than most, although statistically I am.
                      The reason why I'm prospering is that more than 10 years ago during a slow down in the economy (post dot com crash) where I couldn't find a job, I uprooted myself from my cosy life in London, rented out my flat, got into debt to re-train in a Masters degree on the other side of the country, in a city where I knew no-one. I was a 30+ guy living in a student house. I then had to re-establish myself in a changed career so that I could pay my London mortgage. That took about 3 years where I had to rent.

                      It was fooking hard but now I'm coining it.

                      So you'll forgive me if I have no fooking sympathy at all with lazy whining fookers who expect every-fooking-thing on a fooking plate.
                      Ok?
                      Oh you have the monopoly on retraining yourself? You assume no one else has had to redevelop themselves in their career? The point is that is why we are fairly safe employment wise. The less intelligent or fortunate people don't have the option.

                      No its not OK, lets hope when they take to the streets they do your house first. You really are an opinionated, ignorant, selfish ahsole.
                      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X