Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I've seen no evidence that the flooding is unprecedented, but the amount of rainfall since the New Year is off certainly the chart, which was indeed driven by a perturbed Jet Stream, which is indeed one of the predicted consequences of there being more energy in the system.
The floods have probably been made worse by an increase in the amount of built-up areas, concreted front gardens producing more runoff, and also by poor land management - the trend towards farmers, encouraged by subsidy, grubbing up shrubs, trees, hedges and filling in ditches. Also paying inefficient hill farms to keep the hills bare and the soil compacted, by sheep. Remember when fields were smaller, with hedges, ditches and perhaps a small pond and a copse? Cutting and burning grouse moors likely adds to the problem. Not exactly 'green' policies.
That's the flipside of a philosophy that believes land exists only to support landowners and waterways exist only "to get rid of water". Instead of a steady flow sustained around the year by trees in the hills, by sensitive farming methods, by rivers allowed to find their own course and their own level, to filter and hold back their waters through bends and braiding and obstructions, we get a cycle of flood and drought. We get filthy water and empty aquifers and huge insurance premiums and ruined carpets. And all of it at public expense.
Comment